Random holler.............

Eulogy

2009-03-29T22:25:00.002+05:30

A fake. Wht is a fake? The Oxford dictionary defines it as nethin tht is not genuine or counterfeit. It also interestingly lists its origin as unknown. Th reason this is interesting is because tht is also a definition of fake, albeit one tht is rather out thr. Tht whose origin is unknown only cud b considered fake whn its place of origin is claimed 2 b a specific place. N evn thn, it cud only b considered fake aftr it is known tht its place of origin cannot be verified n only in th sense of its origin. In ne othr aspect it cud not be considered fake as just as a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, so also somethin is only as fake as its last unverifiable claim or perhaps more allowing fr Murphy's law. Which in itself is a pretty fair Murphy's law on fakeness as a whole.

The sky moves sideways

2009-02-20T09:30:00.001+05:30

So according to Maxwell, it was possible to go around the second law of thermodynamics which 2 put it simply states tht th overall disorder of th universe increases constantly with time by havin a closed container filled with gas divided into 2 chambers, designated 'A' and 'B' n whnevr a fast particle in A approached th partition, a demon wud open it n let it flow into B n whnevr a slow particle wud approach th partition, it would again open th partition n let it flow into A with th idea being tht aftr a while of doin this, all th slow particles wud b in A n all th fast ones wud b in B n so th disorder in A wudve decreased n th disorder in B wudve decreased n so th disorder in th system hs gone down as initially both partitions were disordered n so this is an xample of th lessening of disorder as opposed 2 th law tht states tht disorder cn only increase, nt decrease but of course, this result ws immediately targeted by othr ppl as a false result as technically th demon which ws fondly christened Maxwell's demon shud also b considered part of th system n therefore its expending energy to drive th whole operation n so its disorder is increasing which in turn is more than compensating fr th decrease in th disorder of th container n so on n so forth but thn, who really cares neway

Undertow

2009-01-11T23:36:00.003+05:30

According 2 biology, 2 survive one needs air, water, food etc etc etc. According 2 physics hwevr, th chief entity tht allows humanity 2 exist is friction. Funny considerin tht friction is blamed fr all th wearing away of things tht drive those maintainence bills up. U knw, wht wit worn brakes n tires n stuff tht actually evry once in a while, help take a life by makin a car roll down a hill coz th handbrake ws worn out n stuff. But thn a frictionless world wudnt xactly b heaven on earth or a bed of roses either. Imagine if u will, a frictionless world. It wud definitely save in transportation costs. Since thr is no friction, one cud simply stand up n ask ne1 nearby 2 kick them n thn just guide themselves wit whtevr method until they reach their desired destination n thn perhaps throw out an anchor 2 stop (no brakes, in case ur wonderin, u cnt hv em in a frictionless world). N thn do th same thing 2 get back. It wud lead 2 rathr painful lives, but thn at least, th price of petrol is saved n of course th planet is a cleaner, greener place as well. But wht else r th benefits of nt havin friction? Well, parts dnt wear down either but thts really bad. I mean, whos gonna care abt th guys who manufacture lubricants n service worn out parts n evrythin? Wht happens 2 them? Thrs just no 100% correct way out nw is thr?

Sober

2008-12-31T21:12:00.001+05:30

In thinkin abt existence, th question tht always seems 2 arise is abt th "plane" of existence which is fr some reason nvr quite clearly defined but is talked abt neways as a concept tht evry1 understands but no1 actually does, nt completely @ ne rate n perhaps they dnt evn agree on th actual definition of wht it is altho perhaps as is th case with a lot of othr ideas, language is a barrier tht stands in th way of truly expressin wht one feels or imagines. But thn wht is th plane of existence as agreed on by th vast majority of ppl? Its sort of related to th idea of "here" and "elsewhere". Th usual idea is tht wht happens on "this" plane of existence (whr v exist) is somethin tht v cn witness either directly or indirectly as in see or hear it or abt it n nethin tht happens on anothr plane of existence is somethin tht cnt b witnessed directly or indirectly or perhaps more importantly, does nt affect us in ne way, gud or bad. N thn naturally one cn wonder abt all th "possible" planes of existence tht r in existence. This leads naturally 2 th query of wht all planes r "possible". To answer this properly, it wud b necessary 2 understand wht is meant by "possible". Wht is possible fr one may or may nt b possible fr anothr. As a simple example, a tall person may b able 2 touch a high object tht a shorter person cannot. So leavin tht aside, wht thn is a possible plane of existence n does such a concept evn hold water?

Searching

2008-11-14T23:53:00.000+05:30

If one wer 2 consider th idea of infinity n more importantly, a representation of infinity, an xample cud b a road tht goes on forevr. Of course, if one tries 2 prove tht it is in fact infinite, its nt quite a possible thing 2 do because evn if one wer 2 walk down it till they drop dead, it still doesn't prove tht th road is infinite beyond ne reasonable doubt simply coz one cannot deny th possibility tht it may simply be very very long. N if tht cannot be ruled out, it is still a possibility, hwevr small. So hw cn it b proved tht th road is infinite? Tough call thr. Hw indeed? Thts fr u 2 figure out...

Rosetta stoned

2008-10-15T22:36:00.002+05:30

Inertia is an interestin thing. Th very natural need fr somethin in motion 2 keep movin or fr somethin static 2 remain static applies 2 motion in our day 2 day lives. Th idea here is 2 xamine inertia in places whr it wud nt fit in or perhaps wudnt evn apply as it ws th wrong concept 2 apply thr. Fr xample, in thinkin of time, one way 2 apply inertia is 2 apply th concept of inertia 2 th concept of time. No matter wht happens, time keeps movin on, thus in a sense makin us all time travellers movin into th future @ th rate of 60 seconds evry minute or 60 minutes evry hour n woe be 2 ne1 who thinks otherwise. But thn th concept of time itself is rathr hazy. By itself time hs no meaning unless thr is somethin 2 measure it by. If one were in a blank room with no openings of ne kind frm birth n nvr witnessed ne motion or indeed ne measurement of ne kind, hw wud they understand th concept of "time"? Well mayb they notice tht certain things happen before certain other things. But thn hw do they evn understand th concept of "before" n "after"? Thr r difficulties n mayb fallacies inherent in our sense of "time". Well thn, wht abt sunrise n sunset or evn morning n night? Again, its nt as clear cut as most ppl might presume. If v believe tht th day begins in th morning, tht sunrise comes b4 sunset n day comes b4 nite. If on th othr hand v surmise tht th day begins in th evening, thn sunset comes 1st n nite precedes day. N neways, this is a far cry frm our original hypothetical situation of a person in a totally blank room with no window n nt evn knowing th concepts of "b4" n "aftr". So 2 sum it up, does inertia apply 2 time? Well, it depends on wht ur concept of "time" is ...

Musterion

2008-09-30T22:33:00.001+05:30

It is said tht th past does nt "exist" newhr physically xcept in ppl's minds and in records maintained by ppl so tht if it wer possible 2 change public n private records n brainwash ppl into believing things tht didnt happen, it is possible 2 control th past. It cud b said tht this is a flawed perspective as one is nt actually controllin th past but is controllin ppl's perception or view or memory of wht happend. Or is it actually controllin th past? Most ppl wud disagree sayin wht hs happend once hs happend n thrs nothin tht cn b done 2 make it otherwise. But thn othr than our belief, wht is thr 2 state tht th past is nt changeable? Of course once v get in tht general direction, thr comes up th idea tht if th past is in doubt, wht abt th present or evn th future? Do things tht happen actually "happen"? Hw do v evn define a happening? V cud draw an analogy 2 wht scientists call an "event". According 2 science, an event occurs whnevr an observation is made. So evn an electron changin its course is an "event" according 2 science altho it may nt b 2 othrs. So also evn water flowing along is an event as it nvr flows th xact same way twice. Wind patterns change constantly, th universe itself is evr changin, thrs 2 many variables 2 evr manage. But othr than tht, wht is a happening? Somethin tht happend or wht...

Fear of a blank planet

2008-08-31T12:49:00.002+05:30

Well, if u wer 2 get bitten by a dog/cat/_____ (insert animal of choice here), u mite fall sick. Nt certainly, but thr is a chance. On a similar note, if u go out whn it is raining very heavily n therefore u get drenched real bad, thn also u cn fall sick with a fever or a chill or whtevr. If a wall comes crashin down on u, then 2 ur gonna crack ur skull or at least get hurt a lot coz aftr all tho th grey matter is well protected inside th thick dome of bone of th skull, th skin on ur scalp (or do v say scalp 2 refer 2 th skin on ur head? nt sure myself...) cn break open real easy n bleed a LOT so if ur squeamish, this may also lead 2 othr troubles besides bleedin outta ur head which cn complicate things (if ur curious 2 knw hw, look elsewhere). Thr r a number of othr things one cud mention like fr xample, mayb lyin down on th rails n waitin fr th train 2 pass altho tht is a more deliberate thing than accidental so perhaps th variation v seek is if one wer 2 trip on th tracks n b run ovr by a recklessly speedin train... yeah thts more like it. Anothr one on tht list wud b fallin of th top of a sufficiently high building n endin up as a salami on th sidewalk :P Or mayb evn fallin in deep water whn one cnt swim, wht do u do thn? Thr r stories of ppl who managd 2 survive till some1 pulled em out by thrashin abt any which way but they r few n far in between. Fr a definite end, one cud substitue th water with quicksand :)

Way out of here

2008-07-19T22:01:00.002+05:30

A simple thought... It is on wht has happend, is happenin n will happen. Is all tht hs happend all tht is supposd 2 hv happend or is it nt? Or is it perhaps all tht ws nt supposd 2 happen but did happen neway? N besides wht is it tht is supposd 2 happen? Cn it b simply defined as nt bein all tht is nt supposd 2 happen? If all tht hs happend is all tht ws supposd 2 happen, is tht correct? Or is it th othr way round with th correct thing bein all tht is nt supposd 2 happen happenin? Well it may b said tht so far all tht hs happend is wht ws supposd 2 happen or ws nt supposd 2 happen dependin on which ws th 'correct' way 2 go coz evrythin seems alrite nw. Obviously, this presupposes tht all tht is happenin rite nw is th 'right' thing. Well, tht is a rathr large supposition 2 make n throws up th idea tht wht all hs happend till nw may nt b wht ws supposd 2 happen as whtevr is happenin rite nw is wrong but thn th past cnt b changed neway so it is useless 2 xpend energy on such thought. N wht abt all tht is supposd 2 happen yet? Will it happen as it is supposd 2 happen or as it is nt supposd 2 happen? Well, again it cn go both ways. If v think wht is happenin rite nw is right, thn wht hs 2 happenwill happen as it supposd 2 happen or vice versa again dependin on which is th 'correct' way. N if wht is happenin nw is wrong, well it is nebody's guess...

Anesthetize

2008-06-20T12:54:00.001+05:30

In time, frm a new viewpoint, th usual cycle of deadening n refreshing, rinse n repeat, circles, small towns n cities n back 2 villages, stones n sticks n thn metal n brick n thn stones again, logarithms n exponents, inverses n thing like tht, rhythm n disorder, chaos, collisions n near-misses, vicarious, upside down or downside up, rise n fall, if, eats, shoots n leaves ... See, it all happens as it should n of course thr r evn consequences of carelessly, throwin th letter 'Q' into a nearby bush coz it cud frighten a bug tht ws in thr minding its own business n it wud take flight n perhaps b eaten by a bird which might nt hv happend if th bug hdnt moved frm whr it ws xcept tht it did n th bird ate it but since it ws very hungry it didnt bother 2 c tht th bug ws in fact poisonous n shud b avoided @ all costs but it went ahead neway n paid fr it wit its life n thn it ws ingested by a quadruped which evn if it didnt die, at least fell pretty sick n thn perhaps it puked in th wrong place n thus caused th sickness n eventual death of yet anothr reptile which ws 2 hv been th meal fr some poor hungry creature which went hungry neway or mayb evn th puke got washed into a stream n a person who drank frm it died n so on n so forth. Of course, this little narrative cn b endless if need b but th simple point is tht throwin th letter 'Q' into a bush cud actually lead 2 u inadvertently killin one of ur own associates.

Steel monkey

2008-05-31T22:12:00.001+05:30

Towards th south, when all goes south, headin south fr th winter, whr it is warmer than in th north n th snow wnt fall n th climate will b more livable. Laterally speakin, thinkin sideways, out of th box (who knws wht inside the box is) n perhaps off th world 2 while th wind blows on th waves. N evn tho energy is ever xistin thr is still an energy crisis which is a self conflict coz if nothin goes back into evrythin, y is anythin tht keeps vanishin disappearin frm all measurable fields, areas, planes, whtevr? N yet nothin cn b produced out of somethin n somethin cn b produced out of nothin altho this may seem counter intuitive, it is true n nt in th sense tht some ppl produce rabbits, silk hats n tambourines out of thin air n thin air out of rabbits, silk hats n tambourines. N neway wht does thin air mean? Coz air itself defies th definition of thin in ne way tht is understood in day 2 day speech fr thin is wht is nt fat or mayb nt thick but 2 call nothin thin wud b really pushin it coz it wud b like sayin tht zero is less coz it is infact always less in th same way tht nothin is always thin n it is actually impossible 2 say tht somethin is more or less or thinner or thicker or longer or shorter than somethin else whn th two cannot be compared in th 1st place, kinda like apples n oranges but which is so typical of day 2 day life...

Eclipse

2008-04-14T20:25:00.003+05:30

If u hv a philosophical outlook on life, @ some point of time u stop caring abt one n th othr which is a problem ne which way u look @ it coz lets face it, hw is it possible 2 care abt somethin in a way th causes u 2 stop caring abt it in th 1st place? Kinda like a chicken n egg situation xcept of course it needs somethin 2 get started, a push so 2 speak which is havin a philosophical attitude towards life but which as already stated wud cause u 2 stop caring abt life neway. So hw does it work? One way of lookin @ it wud b 2 say tht it prevents u frm caring only l8r n nt in th beginning n so one half of ppl wud argue this is nt in fact a antithesis xcept one created by ppl who hv 2 much spare time on their hands n dnt knw wht 2 do wit it. Th othr half wud argue tht this is a profound discovery tht hs philosophical, theological, mystical, mythical, spiritual, logical n many othr implications fr human nature n its ever-changin nature n infact fr all of mankind itself as it quite simply shows tht all th gr8 ppl of past, present n potentially future r quite simply ppl who nvr did well in life n therefore reinvented themselves as soothsayers, seers n speakers n wht nt. N since they r th ones most quoted in th supposedly profound talk tht is supposd 2 matter a lot, does tht mean tht our lives r built on potentially nothing?

Alpha burst

2008-03-30T21:10:00.004+05:30

In time of late, whn n whr no1 is concerned, whn time flows by slowly n fast as it sees fit, n yet it will rain if thr r dark heavy clouds hangin overhead, eventually neway n thr mite evn b a storm, severe or weak wud b nebody's guess. But thn if light is made of photons, whr do they come frm? R they just pure energy or wht? Coz photons r usd 2 xplain th particle nature of light. N so if they r energy, does tht mean energy cn xist as particles? A bit hard 2 imagine but if it is bein bandied arnd by so many heavy hitters in th scientific community, one assumes it hs been sufficiently proven n justified fr ppl 2 accept it. But of course thr is th worry tht science unlike mathematics does nt hv ne equivalent of a proper, indisputable proof. While th mathematical proof starts off with self xplanatory statements or alredy proven statements n so on n proceeds 2 build on em logically, in science, th so calld proof is simply a hypothesis put forward 2 xplain a so far unexplained phenomenon. N th hypothesis is of such a nature as 2 also predict furthr behaviour based on current observations. If these behaviours match th predictions, thr mounts evn more evidence in favour of th theory until th evidence is overwhelmin n it is accepted as a proper theory. Hwevr, it cnt b evr proven 2 th same level as a mathematical theorem but is simply considerd th most likely cause given th circumstances. It is interesting tht so far th reason fr photons comin in2 xistence is nt yet been covered...

Not of this earth

2008-02-18T20:21:00.001+05:30

Th modern world's fixation with th straight edge is rathr unusual. This despite th fact tht thr r no edges as such in th natural world. N is tht y it is so easy 2 tell th natural apart frm th articial, th abundance or othrwise of razor straight edges? But of course thr r othr ways of tellin apart Nature's creation n tht of man which cud include many parameters one of which is time. Th idea bein here tht tht created naturally usually lasts longer than tht created artificially of course with th limit tht both r fairly comparable in durability. Only a dunce wud compare a sponge n an iron bar, th 2nd of which is nt quite artificial othr than in shape as it is but a molded piece of metal which is 100% natural. N thn thr is th point tht mankind hs yet 2 create life or atleast proper life as it wud b agreed upon by one n all. Thr r various terms like scientifically alive n clinically alive or evn physically alive or whtevr, but th very definition of 'alive' is still quite elusive. Wht distinguishes th alive frm th dead? Whethr th answer 2 this is scientific or philosophical or religious or ideological wud b anybody's guess as all ppl seem 2 agree 2 disagree on this one as thr is no singular idea of 'life' in th sense of nethin bein alive n dead. It is ironic tht despite this, modern society cn classify pretty much evrythin it observes as alive or dead.......

Jambi

2008-01-04T16:06:00.000+05:30

Evry once in a while a reboot, restart, rewrite, return 2 th beginnin is recommended so tht th accumulated detritus, garbage, rubbish, leftovers of times gone by is got rid of, th slate is wiped clean, evrythin is begun afresh etc. This cud include throwin out stuff, takin out th trash, a general clearin up of junk. Thn it wud go on 2 startin afresh, goin back 2 th beginning n so on. It is said tht a cleanup evry once in a while is gud as it gets rid of ne xcess, needless baggage tht wud othrwise bog one down. N this cud apply 2 pretty much nethin. While it may apply 2 useless information in th present age, in prehistoric times it cudve referred 2 a carcass tht ws 2 big 2 carry back n so th one ws contented wit carryin back part of it. But no, by society this is nt allowed fr evry1 nowadays needs 2 knw evrythin abt evrythin fr if one doesnt, one is considerd nt fully knoledgeable n yet if one does indeed knw evrythin abt evrythin (figuratively speakin of course), one is labelled a 'know-it-all'. Tread th middle ground thn, as most ppl do. Fr on th one hand u hv Sherlock Holmes who considerd th brain th equivalent of an attic fr thought which did nt hv elastic walls as most ppl thot but simply replaced somethin old wit ne new entry aftr a point. N on th othr, v hv th ppl who recite 16,000 pages of text frm memory showin tht th mind's capacity is beyond most ppl's belief tho nt evry1 is able 2 tap into it effectively. Aftr all, it is believed tht v hardly use abt 10% or so of our true capacity altho ppl who do funny things claim 2 use upto 50% of their capacity...

Hill groove

2007-12-26T15:06:00.000+05:30

Th view frm top, the view frm above, a view unique frm all othr views in tht it looks down on all so 2 speak and all as in truly evrythin else fr nowhr else is such an all encompassin view 2 b found. Nt in ne othr angle but straight up @ 180 degrees 2 th ground. Nt left or right or below but right overhead. A view tht offers a clarity unmatched by ne othr tho it mite also hv th disadvantage of bein a bit 2 far out in a way n thereby negatin th previous benefit, gain, profit, favourable condition etc. N yet it is recommended n rightly so tht this view b followed as far as possible m especially whn all seems 2 b a jam fr it differs fr all else in tht it is different in th truest sense of th word as it is nt deterred by nethin in its way fr th view frm top is th clearest by a country mile. N nt just coz its outside th system under observation which is true fr evry othr view as well but also coz it is free in a way none of th othrs r. Mayb u cnt get arnd somethin tht blocks ur way but ur always free 2 jump ovr it. Comin ovr n above nethin clears it in a way goin arnd it nvr cud. N besides, once u go up, it clears nethin n evrythin tht mite b in th way unlike goin arnd tht wud more likely than nt only clear th immediate obstacle n nt ne othrs tht mite b a bit distant. Of course, th view frm top also lets u get down 2 th brass tacks of it as well.

On an island

2007-11-30T22:24:00.000+05:30

Still thrs nothin 2 bother abt n yet th sheer randomness n th whole symmetry is interestin fr whn th clouds race across th sky, th rocks gt eroded n somehw it all goes on withou ne apparent source fr th action fr it is said tht ne action requires a force 2 begin it n yet th source is nt always obvious as is in fact th case more often than nt tho it is th stated matter n is accepted as true while th projector shones on endlessly n th nite sets in tho th flow of events is never endin n doesnt stop fr ne1 or nethin n nvr evn goes back tho it is calld a dimension n all othr accepted dimensions hv both positive n negative components thus renderin th flow of events th black sheep in th family of dimensions which it is neway by nt bein a dimension of space altho tht is a rathr moot point but thn othr than time, cause n effect r more apparent in th scheme of things without havin 2 look 2 deep as mite seem in th case of time but thrs no point 2 whts bein said here, atleast nt unless one looks closely (thr it goes again) n whethr tht is worth doin is anothr thing altogethr altho it mite b considerin thr is a lot of stuff tht is considerd nonsensical but hs a lot of concealed meaning fr such is th beauty of euphemism n metaphor n such tht wht needs 2 b said need nt b said directly but in a roundabout, beatin arnd th bush kinda way b politically correct or 2 simply state tht wht is meant is nt actually meant n tht th words hv been interpreted wrongly.

New last jam

2007-10-25T15:15:00.000+05:30

N finally th shift happens, no matter wht may b under consideration, b it th flowin of a river or th passing of time or whtevr one may and can think of. U name it, it will inevitably change as th clock ticks on n on endlessly. Evn supposedly permanent things r only permanent in a sense. Quite simply, permanent is just a definition n 2 state somethin is permanent requires permanent 2 b defined first as like evrythin else, it means different things 2 different ppl. A simple xample wud b wheels referrin 2 th things tht cars roll on 2 referrin 2 cars themselves nowadays. Xamples r numerous in number n irrelevant 2 th matter, well atleast in 2 big a quantity. Xcess of nethin is said 2 b bad n reasonably so but thn again a number of paradoxes cud b introduced here dependin on wht kinda spooky view one wishes 2 use 2 look @ th situation. Viewpoints or views dependin on who u ask n whethr u r willing 2 type five xtra chracters. But neways, wht abt th tickin of time itself against which all is measured n noted as permanent or temporary? Is it itself permanent in th absolute sense? Makes sense if tht wer true coz if it weren't n wer only permanent relative 2 somethin else, th entire definition of time itself wud change ignorin th fact tht currently time is defined as a dimension n tht thr mite xist dreamtime which is somewht like th negative element of th three spatial dimensions, ie time rollin back wit effects precedin causes an all th stuff it brings draggin along in its wake.......

Innuendo

2007-09-27T18:19:00.000+05:30

So it hs been found tht if u search fr somethin n need 2 look a bit deep fr it, occasionally u find more than u wer lookin fr which cn b a gud or a bad thing dependin on wht is th xtra stuff u uncoverd. If u uncoverd somethin u hv been lookin fr but nt findin it, it is fine but of course nethin u find which ur nt supposd 2 find mite or mite nt b bad again dependin on wht uve unearthd. N lets face it, findin is again like evrythin else a relative term coz it is said tht th best place 2 hide somethin is a place whr evry1 cn c it coz no1 evr finds somethin tht is hidden directly below their nose!!! So if somethin is hidden in plain view, is it evn hidden? Isn't hidden also a relative term coz if u look @ it one way, no1 cn find it tho they cn c it but wit just a scrap of info, it becomes visible 2 evry1 involved. Wht do v mean by hidin in plain sight neway? Isn't it an oxymoron? Coz hidin implies concealment frm ppl's vision. Wudnt it b more appropriate 2 term it as illusion or distraction since evn if one sees it, they dnt actually c it fr wht it is? Of course, th easiest way 2 hv somethin found is 2 hide it in th deepest, darkest corner coz tht is whr evry1 tends 2 look whn all else fails. N wht do u do if u cnt find it evn aftr havin looked in plain view, right under ur nose so 2 speak? If u hv alredy looked evrywhr, do u start lookin evrywhr else.........

Time machine

2007-08-26T17:29:00.000+05:30

They say tht u shud nvr cling 2 closely 2 ur world as it may come crashin down arnd u netime n usually whn ur least xpectin it. Well, while it hs happend many a time, its one of those lessons tht r learnt n thn immediately forgotten by most ppl but thn who likes nt seein wht they always usd 2 fr a long time n thn find out its disappeard........ Wht abt wrong accusations of things.......are they along th same lines? Probably nt, which is y v wnt look @ them furthr here. Neways, th world crashin arnd u is nt nethin new as it hs happend loads of times as hs been alredy stated. Th things tht hv been arnd fr a long time tend 2 stay arnd fr a long time. Th Copernican principle is derived frm this line of thot n its a statement tht basically sets upper n lower limits on th future xistence of an entity based on hw long it hs been arnd alredy. Hmm... predictin th future based on th past may seem a tad tricky but thn th derived limits r SO far apart tht its very unlikely tht nethin wud actually last beyond its upper limit n similarly th lower limit is so low tht almost nothin, probably nt evn a fragile china dish wud destruct b4 it unless some1 REALLY wanted 2 disprove th theory n smashed th said thing 2 pieces!!! Which makes this theory a rathr useless one fr practical purposes but apparently very useful indeed whn considerd scientifically..............

Surrounded

2007-07-07T02:22:00.000+05:30

N it nvr really comes 2 an end xcept in ur mind perhaps tho of course it is endless as perhaps th universe itself is, mayb evn th multiverse if it evn xists altho thr is no conclusive evidence of tht yet, just plain hypothesis n speculative guesswork, somethin like smoke n mirrors but nt quite, fr tho its nt proved tht it actually xists, it doesnt prevent us frm knowin a lot of stuff abt it, tht is if u cn accept th apparently contradictory fact tht u cn knw a lot abt somethin but u dnt knw whethr it actually xists so in short, u r just speculatin abt wht it wud b like if it actually xisted but thn wudnt it make more sense 2 formulate an xistence theorem 1st instead of learnin more abt a subject th mite nt evn b out thr thereby nullifyin ne useful application of th knowledge tht is bein built up on a foundation tht some mite say is really shaky, nay, evn non xistent in th conventional sense perhaps but thn it is one thing fr somethin 2 b conventionally correct n fr it 2 b absolutely correct n fr it 2 b agreed on by evry1 coz quite simply, evry1 does nt agree on evrythin or infact, nearly nethin fr tht matter coz it is nt said fr no reason tht no 2 ppl r alike n in th real world, evry 2 pp r different in their own way, evn identical twins, leave alone fraternal twins who mite nt evn b of th same gender but thts strayin a bit frm tht topic @ hand...........

Banana mango

2007-06-16T01:17:00.000+05:30

Well wht is it all along? A bit here, a bit there n wht nt............. While things moved on, somethin stayd behind just 2 c wht wud happen if evrythin wer nt movin in a single direction. Of course, nothin major happend. It wasnt like an unstoppable force met an immovable object. Wht wud happen if th above incident wer 2 actually happen? Wud th force mow down th object or wud th object stop th force dead in its tracks? Well, dependin on th circumstances, it cud happen either way is nebody's guess. It cn happen either way but nt both ways. Evn if it cud, v r nt interested in a joint outcome. Circumstances, they r wht matter most in th end, isnt it? They affect th outcomes of ne observation n supposedly evn split th universe into many different universes which may b referrd 2 as th multiverse. Infinite universe, infinite earths, infinite instances of u livin out an infinite number of possible loves. N so if u cud live out all possibilities in one place, u cud quite conceivably b evry person in ur own world by livin out each n evry possible outcome of each n evry decision u make n thereby interestingly seein th many faces of ur character urself. Or course, this is y v r nt allowd 2 do so in reality fr it cud drive us insane or evn worse,................. Well u cn imagine it fr urself.............

Ten words

2007-05-30T23:34:00.000+05:30

Th river still threads its way across th valley like it usd 2 many yrs back n while th tar pit may hv receded frm view, it still leaves telltale sign of its once loomin presence which r still by themselves erodin away into nothingness while othr newer stuff grows on arnd them, as is th rule of nature fr nothin is evr 'lost' n nethin organic in an organic environment must b recycled n usd again in anothr form while of course @ th most basic level, its still th same thing but this is no time 2 get into chemistry but stick simply 2 biology or whtver it is tht describes wht all hs been said above n nw gettin back 2 it, yes, recycling hs been discoverd way back like evrythin tht man supposedly discoverd but ws merely rediscoverin aftr nature but nvr put 2 th same level of use as such but while things r gettin recycled, they r also helpin newer stuff come up n so it is a gr8 circle tht keeps goin arnd but once th river dries up, th main lifeline of th valley disappears n th face of th scenery changes far more quickly than if foreign animals wer 2 intrude into th valley n set up residence thr as th environment wud simply adapt, twist itself arnd so tht th newcomers r nt inconvenienced but othrwise, life wud go on largely unchangd as b4 xcept fr th new entries into tht othr gr8 circle, th circle of life.........

Redshift riders

2007-05-21T22:52:00.000+05:30

Thts an interestin viewpoint. Far out on th cliff whr th rocks started 2 crumble into dust aeons ago n no plant life wud grow in th arid land. Here on this mighty cliff, u may spy, a broken branch tht ws once but a mere part of a mighty tree tht once kept this side of th cliff face in permanent darkness. N this b no othr darkness tht one cud witness fr here on this yonder cliff face ws..............u guessed it, th most deadly tar pit in all of history tht send many a creation 2 their oily graves. Y, it may hv been th work of th dark side itself tht manifests itself in ways tht perhaps evn th light cnt match, let alone outstrip. N yet each n evrythin hs its purpose, so it is said. N so y is it tht this tar pit sprung up here n nt elsewhr on th landscape? Y ws th forest in th distance nt evn given a thot since thr wud b far more victims thr than here? N thrs no clear reason xcept tht hidden pattern tht seems 2 hv a place fr evrythin n evrythin in its place......... Tht hidden pattern tht hs stubbornly resisted all attempts 2 crack it evr since it ws realised tht somethin like it mite xist? A hypothesis 2 b sure but mayb thrs truth in this theory tht hs no concrete evidence in its support othr than th simple thing tht evrythin is just so n evn a fraction of a shift cud cause catastrophic damages? Fr xample thr is this constant tht hs th value or arnd 3.4 or somethin but which if it wer 3.5 wud hv possibly prevented th evolution of intelligent life, namely us.............

Raspberry jam

2007-05-09T20:53:00.001+05:30

Highs n lows, sharps n flats, peaks n valleys, darkness n light, 2 many paradoxes 2 list out completely. A crude mishmash, some mite say n think no further. N it is so fr th union of opposites may seldom b peaceable fr tht is nt hw th world works. Matter n anti matter must annihilate each other n a reaction so violent, it wud destroy them n evrythin else wit them 2. A very bad tempered union this wud b indeed. Nt much of a union neways as it is a full fledged bloodletting. Ball connects 2 socket, plug 2 hole n whtevr!!! Meaninglessly meanderin all th way thru til' finally it all opens out n melts away. In2 blue skies, snow n rain or evn th darkest of black, shockin n slain. Nor do v stand on th periphery of darkness but on th very inside whr th dark arts still hold fort very strongly indeed. A really big tree stands alone n bare amidst all th bloodshed, witness 2 much horror than cn evr b witnessed by man alone. Will thr b no end 2 this black night? Nvr may th skies lighten n nvr may th parched earth bear fruit again. N all along th lone traveller watches transfixed n amazed @ wht time hs wrought on a reality tht will continue 2 xist fr eternity but nvr again in present th same epoch fr viewin. A testament 2 th only absolute postulate tht th only constant is change. N yet while reality may shift n deform endlessly, it is still arnd n hasnt changd one bit..........

Super colossal

2007-04-13T01:13:00.000+05:30

N suddenly nethin n evrythin comes togethr @ a point n thr is no more criss crossing n tangles n stuff but just plain, simple, clear whtevr u wer aimin fr, may it b harmony or just blank space or whtevr indeed. While thr is no absolutely clear path such if v accept th hypothesis tht evry line of sight ends on a star somewhr, thr cn definitely b a clear path fr a limited distance n fr unlimited distance if one does nt restrict oneself 2 only linear paths. V leave out loops here if they loop back onto themselves, closed loops in othr words. On th othr hand v may consider non closed loops altho th concept of a loop itself rathr loses meaning in tht case. A curve tht nvr wraps onto itself is far more believable, fr xample a hyperbola or a parabola. It is believed tht th universe may xist wit a hyperbolic curvature, as in its curved but nvr wraps onto itself unlike th curvature of th earth which is spherical which is a special case of elliptical curvature whn th 2 focii merge into a single point. A universe with such a curvature wud nvr evr collapse under th force of gravity. It wud just keep on xpandin endlessly. Whn one thinks abt th universe n stuff, one cnt help but feel awed by th forces of creation cn they n or course, its evil double, destruction n th 3rd in between, preservation. Frm curvature 2 loops 2 linear paths n linearity n v hvnt evn startd on th curvature of space yet, it sure is a long way...........

The enigmatic

2007-03-31T21:29:00.000+05:30

Oddball, strange, out of place. Somethin of an xample might b tht a blue star is actually hotter than a yellow or red one. In fact th red ones r th coolest n th dimmest. Th blue ones r th hottest n th brightest. N neways speakin of red n blue n stuff, imagine ridin on a ship tht travels way faster than th speed of light n perhaps many times th speed of light. Wht wud u call such ppl, faster-than-light space travellers? Nah, 2 lengthy n nt trendy enuff. No, hws abt th extremists? Well, nw tht sounds much better n snappier, doesnt it? Sure does. N imagine th situation tht th warp drive (th scientific thingy used 2 propel oneself 2 faster than light speeds) malfunctions. But thn of course, netime v get 2 tht level of scientific advancement, v wud hv repair sheds across th galaxy n it wudnt b a major headache. N thn probably malfunctions n failures wnt b a issue thn coz engineering levels wud hv gone up by leaps n bounds 2 evn manufacture such a thing as a warp drive. While on th subject of warp drive, while scientifically possible, th warp drive cudnt b randomly usd newhr n evrywhr. Th path wud hv 2 b laid out in advance n th ship wud only travel thru tht path which itself wud hv 2 b put down by ships travelin @ slower than light speeds. In othr words, th ship wud b more like a train tht cn only go whr th tracks lead, nt newhr else. Ah well, whoevr said reality ws sweet all th way thru..........

Drain

2007-03-26T21:07:00.000+05:30

Happens evry once in a while. U only booked a ticket fr th end of th solar system n u ended up on th edge of th Milky Way. N of course, u r stranded thr without ne return fare or evn ne hitch-hiking possible coz lets face it, hw many ppl actually r thr on th edge of our galaxy???!!! But u must get back n get back immediately. Nt havin ne warp-drive ships @ ur disposal is a big handicap n thn u dnt evn hv th technology 2 create a wormhole. Damn! Whr r black holes whn u need them most!!! U r supposd 2 b chillin out on Pluto but instead u r stuck on some godforsaken planet n u dnt evn knw whr u r. Th transport tht left u here hd 2 hv th rudest conductor who pushed u off whn he saw tht u hd overslept n missed ur stop by a few light years. N thn he hd 2 throw u here whr it is said tht no othr transport will come fr a while. Rumour hs it tht th next tramsport wnt come along fr abt a few yrs atleast. Ouch! Wht a disaster!!! Hw r u evn goin 2 get out of this mess whn evry solution u cn think of needs technology tht u dnt hv??? Think, damn u think, u urge ur brain. But tht stupid spacesuit ure wearin is no gud @ helpin u think coz unfortunately th cooling system is nt workin properly......... A fix if evr u hv been in one. N is thr ne solution actually possible.................

Crystal planet

2007-02-18T11:55:00.000+05:30

Well thr r quite a few things tht bother us nw n thn.......... Like y do flies or mosquitoes or insects in general only nag u whn u want 2 badly get some rest? Or y u cn find somethin ur lookin fr only hrs aftr u hv stoppd lookin fr it? Or y th grass is always green on th othr side? Th 'othr' side of things hs always fascinated th intellect n managd 2 grasp our attention like little else. N this without it doin nethin but just bein a logical outcome of th old adage tht evry coin hs 2 sides. It is believed tht th greatest trick th Devil evr pulled ws makin th world believe tht he didn't xist. But ovr time as wit th benevolent entity, thr must also b a malevolent entity 2 balance things out n thr u hv it. Th Devil's trick no longer is of ne use @ all. Wht is it abt th othr side tht mystifies us so? Surely it must b somethin more than just its mere xistence. Or is it just tht? Tht its thr n nothin cn evr b done 2 prevent its being? Its xistin? Th othr side need nt always b th dark n dreadful either. It cud also b th bright n beautiful 2 behold. But its always in our presence. Its quite simply, thr!!!! Th lesser understood, lesser analysed, often overlooked half of nethin v study or discover or learn. It may b glossed ovr but it cnt b denied. Th law of duality which is perhaps th most overreaching principle in human life must b indiscriminately applied 2 nethin n evrythin tht cn b coverd in human thot without evr considerin a second viewpoint........

Vicarious

2007-02-06T00:01:00.000+05:30

Burnt out, strung out, 2 tired.............oh whn does th long road end??? Mayb sometime in th near future, mayb sometime in th far future, mayb nvr @ all......who knws? Perhaps some1 knws but tht some1 aint talkin, th dumb idiot!!! Ppl who hv information n refuse 2 speak out just coz they think it elevates em 2 a higher position than some1 'nt in th knw' truly drive me up th wall!!! Speakin of bein driven up th wall, whr does tht saying originate? Did th original speaker want 2 describe th situation n just by chance a monkey ran up th wall which he ws leanin against? Or perhaps a snake slithered up th wall right past him n he just jumped out of his skin in fright n just happend 2 utter 'driven up th wall'. Later, as th phrase ws so memorable n since he got irritated tht he ws scared fr no reason as th snake ws just a harmless grass snake tht ws nearly omnipresent in his town n ws infact welcomed as it lessened pests, he made th phrase refer 2 bein irritated real bad. Tht wud fit wonderfully well as it gives an origin 2 th phrase as well as th reason y it is associated wit th situation it is associated wit as of nw. But th only problem is a complete lack of evidence!!! While it is true tht in ancient times, ppl wer less paranoid of snakes thn they r nw, it is highly unlikely tht a snake cudve inspired a saying n tht 2 one in such common use!!! If some1 counters this wit, "Well, wht inspired th legend of th milk snake???" I wud just tell em its nt my business 2 uncover all legends in th world.............

Speed of light

2007-01-31T19:10:00.000+05:30

Well, thr is a statement made which I once came upon n remembered right nw which says tht most ppl read while noticin th upper half of th script. To demonstrate, thr ws th bottom half of a common saying which ws presented as a challenge 2 ne fool tht disagreed. Th saying in question ws 'TIME FLIES'. Imagine takin away th top half or simply write down th bottom half elsewhr n try readin it. It's fairly undecipherable, isn't it? N thn I came upon anothr optical illusion (it ws billed tht way but Im nt sure if tht label applies properly) which cud give u th illusion of havin taken drugs or somethin as it gave u sorta blurred, almost tunnel vision. Well optical illusions aside (they r always given th tagline, 'Don't believe evrythin u c'), They r just anothr way of questionin spatial perception. N so hw is it tht v hv a concrete picture of th world arnd us? Hw do v knw fr xample, tht th really big tree tht appears larger than th house its beside is truly nt smaller? Relative perception sure is confusin n somethin thts darker cud appear lighter n stuff like tht. Neways, larger n smaller, brighter n darker r relative terms by nature, aren't they? As wud b longer n shorter etc which is probably th long n short of it...... Well questionin is fine as long as reasonable questions r asked n wht abt unreasonable stuff? One such query wud b y somethin is done th way its done..... Or perhaps y do nethin @ all if v hv 2 die one day eventually.....

The frightened city

2007-01-27T12:37:00.000+05:30

N so somethin keeps on happenin with such impeccable regularity, its considered part of life n kinda put aside. Tht is until it stops happenin with its characteristic regularity n suddenly it feels odd. Whr is it gone? Wht hs happend 2 it? N so on n so forth. A river may change its course durin ne time of its xistence. A planet may b nudged out of its orbit by ne othr body. Rocks may tumble n cliffs may crumble. Th wind may change its direction without so much as a warning tht sailboats r goin 2 b in trouble very soon. Speakin of which, if thr cn b a sailboat, y cnt thr b a sail car? A car tht runs off of wind power wud b a gr8 idea which it is in concept but in practise highly improbable as while controllin a sailboat is fairly simple coz of th low speed, a sail car wud b xpected 2 reach a fairly high velocity 2 b accepted n therefore wud need a fairly quick hand 2 control th sail 2 adjust it 2 th wind. Science fiction? Well, atleast no theories of intergalactic travel or intelligent life on othr planets is bein xpounded here. It's just a simple thing of makin a hybrid of 2 unrelated things tht's all. Like for xample, makin a pomato or totato, whtevr u wanna call it which wud b a hybrid of a tomato n potato. Wud it b brown on th outside n soft n fleshy on th inside or wud it b red with a hard interior which needs 2 b cut up with a knife? Ah, hybridisation hs endless boundaries atleast in concept tho in reality it is far more limited. But whn in a mood fr thinkin, who's botherd abt th real world neways.........

Helter skelter

2007-01-23T07:06:00.001+05:30

Irrelevancy hs a curious aura abt it, wudnt u agree? Random stuff strung togethr wit no rhyme or reason somehw feels better than somethin tht leads logically frm one thing 2 th next. This is of course provided th randomness is tastefully done. TRULY random stuff is anothr matter howevr. If th lions wer unhappy abt somethin bein 2 easy, wht wud they do abt it? Time is a river n v r crocodiles swimmin along wit it. Heisenberg's uncertainity principle tells us tht observation influences measurement so tht means tht while oscillations r th order of this world meanin tht all events repeat themselves, they will nvr play out in xactly th same way as th uncertainity principle proves tht it is impossible. Thr wud b minor variations. Takin up th simplest xample which is th Big Bang, it hs been postulated tht it wud b followed by a Big Crunch @ some point of time. Whn is nebody's guess. But assumin it does happen, hw wud th nxt Big Bang differ frm this one? Wud it lead 2 formation of a different type of Universe? Or wud tht b 2 big a variation than cud evn b allowed wit th uncertainity principle? Hw else cud it b different? Formation of intelligent life on many planets perhaps.......... Thr is no conclusive evidence 2 support thr bein no othr intelligent life in th current Universe, it is true, but crucially thr is no evidence against it either. Hangin in th middle, sittin on th fence etc wud b some of th adjectives tht cud b applied 2 th current situation. Interpretation is left open 2 th reader as to y time may b considered a river n all of us crocodiles movin along wit it...........

Satch boogie

2007-01-16T21:07:00.000+05:30

Is thr love in space? Is thr ne othr way than forward? Y is turnin 2 th left so much easier than turnin right? Does intelligent life xist in outer space? R interstellar planetary objects a reality? N wht abt scattered disk objects? Does ne xplanation fr overturned theories xist or can they nvr b salvaged again once shown 2 b conclusivey wrong? Y does one always tend 2 follow established trends n cliches? Y r photons classified as particles whn they hv no discernible mass? Do causal loops xist? Can time travel indeed be done altho proved theoretically proved possible? Can causal self-consistent loops b created? Y does science fiction so often precede scientific fact? Would surfin wit aliens evr materialise? Y is th speed of light perhaps th only proper limit in th Universe? Y nt, fr xample, th speed of sound? Whn a connection fails, whr do all th little electrons or photons tht make it up go? Y does water always take th easiest path while flowin? Wud it b actually possible fr some1 2 b their own father AND mother??? Or more simply, their own father OR mother? Can a person actually go back n kill his grandfather so tht he wud nvr xist n therefore prevent him frm killin his grandfather? Y is randomness inherent in th very nature of space? Y do all planets rotate counter-clockwise (as whn viewin frm above altho out thr 'above' n 'below' hv no proper meaning)?

Zap

2007-01-10T01:00:00.000+05:30

A bit fast, a bit slow.........somewht uptempo again n thn back 2 th grind. Ultimate shreddin followed by a sudden halt. Sudden time shifts alongside xtremely rapid overall changes in texture n colour. Oh hell, come on.........thr cudnt possibly b a more abstract description of nethin nw cud thr? Th only thing tht cud perhaps b figured out based on above passage is a certain random event tht changes evry nw n thn. But oddly enuff, v ain't done yet!!! No sire, nt @ all. Furthr oddities include th omission of wht is perhaps considered th main thing in th field whr this thing belongs. N fr wht? Oh well, perhaps 2 demonstrate tht removal of wht is considered th main thing does nt hv 2 hv such a major effect, leave alone a bad one. N it cn actually b pulled off pretty well 2, provided it is done right. Fr th uninitiated, if nt done right as it is most times evn by th masters, th result is a crude mish-mash tht in th words of some ppl left them cold as it ws 2 cerebral........ Oh of course, like all things, it hs its supporters n its detractors. 2 its credit, th true masters need true skill 2 do it well n those who cnt, just cnt. Thrs no shortcuts here n definitely no middle ground simply coz th middles ground lies @ th very place whr it gets messed up. N while 2 th spectator it may nt seem a very hard task 2 accomplish, well, tht is left 2 ur imagination...........

Pictures of home

2007-01-01T23:01:00.000+05:30

New, new, new............. tht one word hs so many implications of many different kinds..........it cn b made in2 a backronym of many things like fr xample new endless wait which incidentally wud b a recursive backronym, probably a 1st of its kind coz no1 hs th spare time or r jobless enuff 2 cook up backronyms 2 common words in evryday use n fr no particular reason othr than 2 pass time n 2 feel tht they r actually doin somethin whn infact they r doin nothin of th sort @ all but just wastin more quality time tht cud b spent usefully in so many othr ways like fr xample thinkin of ways 2 pass time or doin somethin useful but thn of course th definition of useful varies dependin on wht kinda ppl u put th question 2 coz a regular lazy lump aint gonna agree tht walkin instead of usin a vehicle is a better thing 2 do but tht is an opinion tht doesn't matter all tht much coz its th opinion of ppl tht matter tht truly matters in a manner of speakin but is tht a misuse of vocabulary or does it hv ne meaning 2 speak of, a meaningful meaning in othr words or does it nt but cn b made 2 by forcefully intrepretin it 2 match whtevr meaning one wants 2 pull out of a hat, a bit like th original interpretations of Egyptian script which covered literally evrythin frm Alpha 2 Omega xcept probably th actual meaning of th script but thn th actual thing is always hidden right under ur nose whr u dnt look fr it..............

Shadoogie

2006-12-31T06:46:00.000+05:30

Wht is n wht nvr shud b. OK, tht ws a direct quite frm, well, somewhr!!!! Only God knws whr. Well, nt actually. I do but if u dnt, I ain't gonna enlighten u.......... So neways, on wit it!!! N on wit wht? Th new year approaches fast n furious heraldin a change of times tht is far more than just a rollin ovr of th clocks or th turnin of calendars............. N yet thr r some things tht always remain th same. Some things tht nvr change. Th song, fr xample. Or perhaps evn Inglish!!!! N thn thr r some things tht need far less than a year 2 change. Th aforementioned clock n calendar tick ovr evry day n th former, evry second, minute n hour as well. Well, thrs also radioactive decay tht cn happen in mere thousandths of a second........... So y is th second chosen as th standard measure of time? Is it necessary 2 b able 2 count time passin without a watch? Isnt th lengthenin of a shadow enuff? Or did later comparison take precedence? Thr is anothr thing though, tht like time n tide, waits fr no1. Tht cud only b th train. Ppl may mention ships n planes in th same breath but no, it just doesnt fit. No, th smoke n soot belchin iron horse ws n always will b a classic. Leavin trains aside n returnin 2 th topi dealt wit @ th beginnin of this rant, while th new year may approach n push us closer 2 th nxt decade, truly some things will nvr evr change fr only God knws wht.....................

Slick

2006-12-28T10:38:00.000+05:30

So.................... mmm.................... errrrr.......................... ummmm................wht were u xpectin 2 see, eh?????? Did those long lines of dots or points (in mathematical terms) or full stops (in linguistic terms) or periods (in general terms) confuse ne1? Ahh but patterns r so interestin n probably th best way of confusin th mind. Some patterns tht r decidedly asymmetrical seem symmetrical n of course patterns tht r dissimilar appear 2 b similar. Is this coz ppl's spatial perception or coz th pattern is nt conceived properly by th mind? But isn't failure of spatial perception directly implyin failure of th mind? Coz th only option is poor vision n tht is nt quite enuff 2 cause a loss in spatial perception. Space.......... it is @ once vast n tiny, both within n without n both empty n filled. Whtevr.........Oh wait a large gap in th middle of puttin down somethin xtensive can b disastrous. Th natural flow is lost. Aftr all if water is let in out in th cold long enuff (n provided th cold is 'cold' enuff!!!) it will freeze unless some1 hd th sense 2 pour antifreeze in2 it which cud b or cudn't b dependin on th IQ of th person in question n whethr th water in question needs 2 stay in a liquid state. If nt, thrs no point in th above action. Nope, it wud b totally senseless. On th othr hand ice needs 2 stay solid in enclosed spaces n needs 2 b melted out in th open. Damn, y nt just say tht water shud remain as ice in th open n as water in closed spaces........

So

2006-12-24T17:14:00.000+05:30

N thn thr were none or thr ws nothin. Th scenario mentioned in th previous sentence happens @ wht times if @ all? Whn thr is no1 or nothin. Simple, right......... Imagine arrivin all of a sudden right in th middle of a desert. N hw did tht happen? Materialisin out of thin air onto th very spot is one obvious option. Anothr option is tht u wer doped or drunk or othrwise incapacitated n incapable of knowledge of ur surroundings n thots while u wer dragged up 2 whr u nw lie or sit or (most improbable if u wer actually out) stand. Mayb its also possible 2 b somewhr just by wishin 2 b thr but this method is still unproven n hence shall nt b considered here. Only proven fact n thts all!!!!!!!! N thn thr were none or thr ws nothin cud also b applied 2 somethin began wit no proper direction or purpose in mind. Obviously, some1 attemptin 2 deal wit 2 much nitrous oxide (which is used in cars fr a temporary boost in speed n while it is highly xplosive, it is also a general anaesthetic n once ws used as laughin gas. Talk abt multi-talented gases!!!!) while havin no trainin in xplosives is gonna come 2 a messy end. No, this messy end wud b probably FAR more messy than th Iron Maiden which in itself is one of th yuckiest methods of xecution. I'm sure most of th ppl closed in it were already dead due 2 fright b4 th damn thing closed on them properly...........

Twist in the tale

2006-12-23T21:32:00.000+05:30

Sometimes a thot is all it takes. Or perhaps evn an idea n of course as evry1 knows, ideas r bulletproof. Surprised? Dnt b. Aftr all it is true. Some things take years 2 develop n some take just a few minutes. N it can't b conclusively argued tht th scope of either is further or better. Need an xample? Go look, thrs a lot out thr 2 b seen if u only open ur eyes n observe. Well, binoculars or a telescope cn help in tht, cnt they? Oh yeah, they sure do. Mayb u will b able 2 decide on whethr th horse u bet on won or nt but will they help newhr else? Clarity of vision.........hw is it achieved? Thrs a 1st time fr evrythin , isn't thr? N tht 1st time ur inexperienced, like it or nt. Tht is unless of course u cheated (Im nt sure wht amounts 2 cheatin in this case but assumin it so........) n asked some1 else abt their prior xperiences or found out in ne which way abt wht is comin ur way. Nw is tht defined as preparation or cowardice? Well, no1 wants 2 b caught wit their pants down, right? Brings us back 2 hw ideas r bulletproof. Simple. Spread around an idea enuff n its very very hard 2 kill. It may b manifested in an act like blowin up a building or evn simply postin onto a website. Whr wer v? Dnt knw. Cnt quite remember. Seem 2 hv blown a few fuses somewhr high up!!! Brain nt functional ne longer. I CUD just skip back a few sentences n read wht ws written but I CHOOSE nt 2. Cause n effect, choice n wht comes 2 pass, all tht trash............

Seconds

2006-12-13T01:02:00.000+05:30

Th time of th year is indeed winter once more. Th time whn its 2 cold 2 venture out without a good sweater or jacket on. Also th time whn th days r shorter n th nights r longer. Oh yeah, almost forgot, th time whn ur hemisphere of th earth is tilted away frm th sun which causes all above mentioned effects. Th time whn snow falls is certain places cold enuff tht th water vapour in th air freezes instead of merely condensin. Evr wondered y a snowflake is so symmetrical? Interestingly, all of em hv six sides n no 2 of em r evr th same. Kepler xplained tht it ws because a snowflake began as a tiny seed n grew so gradually tht th whole thing ws absolutely th same frm every side. As 2 it havin six sides, th hexagon is th closest u cn get 2 a circle with straight lines. They r th preferred shape in wireless communication as well............. Comin down frm infinity 2 six is sure a big leap, isn't it? Wht is bein referred 2 here???? Y of course th number of sides of th figures in question........ th circle hs infinite sides n th hexagon hs six. Coverin of area effectively is sure an intriguin topic, btw. Tilin a surface so tht it is completely covered cn b done in many ways. Considerin an infinite surface (thr goes infinity again!!!!!!!) thrs an asymmetrical form of tilin tht uses two tiles which cn cover th whole surface but each tile on its own cnt. Th old adage of it takin two 2 tango seems 2 apply very well here. Nt one of those irrtatin universal axioms, this one. IT definitely doesn't take two 2 read, does it? If u closed one eye, u cud still read with th other. Or evn Braille. All it takes is one finger...........

Untold misery

2006-12-08T10:09:00.000+05:30

Well, sometimes chasin a road right until th end just leads one 2 a dead end with no option but 2 turn arnd n go all th way back or atleast until th nearest fork. But occasionally th end reached is nt dead but very much alive xcept tht th territory beyond is unexplored n unknown. With no map in hand, th most logical thing is 2 turn back n follow charted ground. But it is said tht some1 who thinks logically is a nice contrast 2 th real world. This seems 2 state tht th real world is inherently illogical tho logic hs xplained most of its untold secrets. But leavin logic n th real world aside, xplorin unexplored places sure may b fun but its gotta b dangerous atleast a little, right? U walk in xpectin th sea n thn u realise ur right in th middle of a swamp!!! Mayb u took a wrong turn somewhr back or u hd bad directions. Th only reliable directions u cn evr get r frm a compass or frm th stars n th sun. By th way, maps tht distort th size of land masses r used in navigation as they preserve th overall shape or else crucial landmarks like creeks n bays get distorted makin it nearly impossible 2 use th map 2 find one's way. On th othr hand, a map tht doesn't distort sizes but distorts shapes is used 2 compare areas of lakes, land masses n othr stuff in general. One fr navigation n one fr comparison. N one in between. Yep, a compromise. If thrs one xtreme n anothr xtreme, thrs gota b somethin in th middle right? Somethin tht does both things but does neither very well n therefore always remains in th middle which is neither here nor thr...........

Sugar magnolia

2006-11-28T21:18:00.000+05:30

Somethin is done or it happend n thr is no known way of reversin wht hs already happend. While time travel xists as one possibility, it is said tht changin evn th smallest thing in th past could hv devastatin repercussions on th future n possibly th present which of course is th future of th past. So wht is done is done, set in stone etc............... No, alternate futures wnt b discussed here as of nw. Mayb anothr time. Wht is th whole point in bringin up th very ideas tht r abt it thn? 2 look @ alternatives, thts wht, which is th usual purpose if looked back on........... Look back, walk back, backtrack etc. Realise an error hs been made n thn move back a step or evn a number of steps dependin on hw far back th error ws made. Y nt map out a perfect path 1st n thn proceed down it so tht thrs no need fr backtrackin in th 1st place? Probably coz unlike mathematics n logic, life itself hs no 'perfect' path.......... Funny hw th most step-by-step n logical science is used 2 xplain th most illogical thing under th sky in which nethin may happen @ netime, newhr n wit ne1. Th application of somethin 2 xplain or othrwise discover its opposite......... Interesting concept. S it shud theoretically b possible 2 use fiction 2 xplain fact n vice versa, shudn't it? Thts th logical outcome of stated statement. Of course, quite simply, again, here logic is bein applied 2 interpret a real life situation which may or may nt b th correct approach...........

Two princes

2006-11-24T18:42:00.000+05:30

Th way of evrythin in th end. While evrythin is said 2 hv an end, is it evr properly specified wht tht end is? N here v aren't referring 2 Armageddon or th total destruction of evrythin material or th doomsday or whtevr th soothsayers may state. If tht is th only 'true' end, thn I withdraw ne more statements tht might b made here. N wht abt symbolism? Wht does th true end symbolise? Y does it always conjure up images of death n destruction? Th very concept of symbolism is a fairly incertain one as nethin may symbolically stand fr somethin in one place or 2 some1 while it may mean somethin else entirely 2 othr ppl or locations. N goin recursively, does symbolism itself symbolise somethin? Thrs a lot of things tht r recursive, by th way. Thr r recursive acronyms tht seem 2 b th latest fashion in namin computer programs. Computing hs always hd recursive functions frm day one 2 simplify solutions. Does simplification itself serve ne purpose? Over simplification itself is bad as it usually corrupts th beauty of th solution. It is said tht beauty is th 1st test; thrs no permanent place fr ugly answers. Wht does beauty in this context mean? Does it mean writin down th answer neatly wit gud handwritin or somethin? Definitions sure differ, dnt they whn applied 2 different things? Th word 'set', fr xample, hs th largest number of meanings in English, wit some hundreds of meanings as a noun, some more hundreds as a verb (cnt recall th xact figures nw) n ten as a participle adjective. Yeah, definitions differ all ovr th place. Kinda like symbolism, eh? N Im nt sayin tht th two r th same tho they might b similar or atleast kinda related...........

No quarter

2006-11-20T01:09:00.000+05:30

Imagine walkin down a roadway somewhr whr th Imperial system of drivin on th left is followed. Whn ur walkin on th right side, ur actually walkin on th wrong side. N in case ur walkin on th right side, ur in truth walkin on th left side. Hw cn somethin b itself n its own opposite @ th very same time eh? Hw is this possible? It is definitely nt possible fr somethin 2 b light n dark @ th same time or is it? Naturally a solid object (by solid v mean defined in three dimensions, or four if u believe Einstein) wit a dark side n a light side comes 2 mind. Does tht fit th criteria? Takin up Einstein again tht evrythin is relative, somethin may b long 2 one n short 2 anothr. Does th opposite of evrythin evn xist? If this b taken as true @ face value, relativity shud hv an opposite which might b labelled absoluteness or somethin along those lines. N wht cud absoluteness or whtevr it is called postulate? Tht thrs an absolute measure fr nethin n evrythin? Just 2 make up fr all th relativistic nonsense tht ws supposedly a furtherin of knowledge whn it came out? If so is absoluteness also a parallel new theory or just a paradox which shudnt xist @ all? A phantom, in othr words? A ghost tht simply finds mention in th human mind? Considerin th effects of relativity cn b largely ignored in daily life, does absoluteness evn need 2 b evr written down as a formal theory? Or evn need 2 b disproved, nw tht its counterpart hs apparently provided evrythin needed 2 xplain hw evrythin else works.......................

Something

2006-11-18T11:05:00.000+05:30

Th lame life drags on sweatin, tirin, etc. Whtevr. Wasn't life supposed 2 b a non-livin, abstract kinda thing??? Somethin tht is thr but nt quite thr? Speakin of which, cn life itself b considered livin or non-livin or does th very concept itself break down @ tht point? Perhaps yet anothr limitation of which atleast one is discovered evry nw n thn........ But I digress. Whr wer v? Oh yeah, life bein abstract n stuff like tht. Y n frm whr ws this discussion on wht life is evn begun in th 1st place? I hv no idea but since v dnt knw whr it began, hw abt decidin th middle n th end randomly 2? Seems fair as it doesn't seem tht this xposition or whtevr u wanna call it ws started wit a specific purpose in mind. Nearly mindless meandering hehehehehe. Or perhaps it IS mindless meandering. Nw if life xists as v all agree, I hope, thrs gotta b a reason fr it, shudn't thr? Aftr all thrs a place fr each n evry thing under th sun n evrythin's usually in its place unless its nt in its place in which case thrs an anomaly or problem or....... U get th idea. Those who dnt agree tht it xists, walk away n dnt look back. Ur nt in ur place so lessen some of th trouble God hs 2 clean up, will ya? Does evrythin hv a proper reason fr xistin neways? Assumin thts true, wh cud b th possible reason fr th xistence of life? 2 distinguish th earth frm othr planets cud b one possible reason. Nethin else? Well it hs been hypothesised tht life is nt all tht common as a whole in th Universe. Anothr school of thot states th xact opposite as usual. So, th only thing 2 come out of this whole mish mash probably is tht while life may hv a reason fr xistin, it ain't all tht common (meanin it aint all tht important either!!!) n th reason fr its xistence still remains unknown (n probably will b tht way fr aeons 2 come mayb...........)

Cross eyed mary

2006-11-11T00:08:00.000+05:30

N so @ last, th topic is stated in th very 1st line itself. Is it all in ur head? I mean, wht do v mean 2 say whn v say tht somethin is 'real'? It can't mean material or somethin coz thn thots n feelings which hv no 'real' xistence but r real enuff 2 us cease 2 b real. 'Real' cud mean fruit juice 2 some evn!!! Is evrythin arnd us real or is it all just in our head? A matter of perception, so 2 speak? A dog, fr xample, perceives th world in a fairly different way frm human beings, so its sense of real should also b different. Or should it nt? Considerin th main differences r tht it doesn't see in as many colours n smells n sounds r a lot more intense, with th hearing xtending into th ultrasonic range............ On a related subject, cats n owls cn see better than human beings in poor light but no animal cn see in complete darkness. In a photographer's darkroom, u wud see just as much as ne creature u care 2 cart along, altho th photographer might nt allow tht in th 1st place hehehehehe. Neways, if tomorrow evry1 sees th sky as red n says its red, hs reality been altered? This is of course assumin tht th sky hs actually become red as far as v cn detect evn usin technology. Or is just a limitation of perception? Wht is 'actual reality', a reality free of ne limitation or nethin? Does it evn xist or is it just a figment of our imagination? Is it tht thr is no 'absolute' reality n tht it is defined by wht one wants 2 make of it? Tht wud follow frm th old maxim 'Evrythin is relative, thr is nothin absolute' Th problem here is this statement is a self-paradox. If nothin is absolute, neither is this statement. N if evrythin is relative, so is this statement which means it may b interpreted differently relative 2 th situation........

Thunderstruck

2006-11-08T09:08:00.000+05:30

Wht is a fact? More 2 th point, wht is information? Information is said 2 b ne known fact. N wht abt somethin tht is known but nt necessarily known 2 b fact? Wud tht b classified as information as well? Fr xample, if u knw a certain story which is known 2 b fiction, isn't it generally agreed 2 b information despite nt bein fact? Does knowin nethin @ all come under havin information? N thn tht leads us 2 believe tht information cn b broken down in2 various varieties like crap, concept level n legend. Tht cn also b applied 2 ppl, cnt it? Based on their way of thinkin, tht is. Ppl cn b classified in2 3 groups apparently. One group talks abt really abstract stuff. Th 2nd talks abt happenings n things related 2 tht. Th 3rd group talks all th time abt themselves. Egocentric, in othr words. N as fr ppl who claim 2 b absolutely selfless, it's nearly impossible. Evry1 looks fr personal gain sometime or th othr.......... Revenge.....advisin ppl evn whn it is 2 ur disadvantage. Inevitably, thoughts begin wanderin as is their wont n veer off most verbosely. Cn th human brain b defined evr satisfactorily as a machine? Does evn a learnin, thinkin, evolvin machine come close? Leave alone th fact tht it cnt run fr abt 85 years with hardly a single proper breakdown. Just as u cnt compare a pump 2 a heart which pumps fr abt 85 yrs again without missin a beat n relaxin between beats...... Typically, this trash talk turns most trashy so let's just leave it here..........

Fireball

2006-10-29T02:08:00.000+05:30

The hw. Th y. Th who. Th wht. Th whr. Th whn. Th underlyin pattern. Th hidden force tht supposedly keeps a place fr evrythin n evrythin in its place. Th main question. WHY does/did somethin happen????????? Th one answer tht humanity hs been strugglin towards since eternity. Reason. Th simple act of xplaining y somethin panned out th way it did instead of a thousand possible othr ways. MOstly whn so many xplanations r possible, th one tht actually occurs is th 'most probable' or 'th only one likely 2 happen'. This cycle cn actually b xtended backwards almost indefinitely. I wnt say indefinitely coz I haven't tried xtendin it beyond th 1st level. Infact th 1st level itself is troublesome. Neways, gettin back 2 xtendin th cycle backwards, wht is meant is tht u cud thn tackle th issue of xplaining y th most plikely xplanation or th one most likely 2 happen is so. Thn perhaps u cud find th reason behind THAT xplanation n so on n so forth............ Yeah, guess th cycle IS indefinite aftr all!!!!!!!!! So, wht IS th need fr reason? Is it evn required so badly tht th search fr it nvr quite ends? Is lack of reason as bad as it is claimed 2 b? Imagine a world without reason. Evrythin happens xactly as it used 2 b4. No change thr. Infact it wud free us of lot of burdens. Whn th foundations of science r nt laid, u dnt need 2 think abt solvin n-th degree differential equations either. N neither does th earth's orbit need 2 hv so many implications. Of course, it also means tht ur stuck @ a stone, rubbin a stick along it 2 gt a fire coz u dnt understand th chemical combo tht goes into makin a match..................

Firebreath

2006-10-23T22:49:00.000+05:30

Th circle. Considerd by most as th most perfect shape. Th natural shape fr manhole covers as it cnt fall in2 th manhole as th diameter is always constant arnd th circumference n cn b rolled arnd newhr it is required. Also th cross-section of a pipe as thr is uniform stress thruout th pipe. Th 'smoothest' of all planar figures. Infinitely many sides. Always hs an irrational figure as th length of its closed loop if opened out. Simply a closed loop under topology n therefore, indistinguishable frm a square or a rectangle or triangle or whtevr!!! Gravity pulls evrythin in2 a roughly spherical shape which is th 3-D cousin of th circle. As does ne uniform attractive force in all directions but tht is anothr thing. Th gr8 circle of life. Th circle in th food chain. Circles in th real world, as fr xample, th water cycle. Evrythin ends up eventually, sooner or later, whr it began. Einstein predicts tht World War IV will b fought with stones just like prehistoric man. Gud in evry way n yet bad in none. Cn this b? Do v finally hv somethin tht defies common intuition tht gud n bad r 2 sides of th same coin n one cnt xist without th othr? A coin is ALSO a circle, by th way. Wht began as atoms ends up as atoms. A wave is a huge group of water droplets movin in a perfect circle. Each drop ends up xactly whr it startd in th circle. Th most perfect of shapes? Depends on hw u define perfection really. But certainly, th most prevalant concept of planar geometry in day 2 day life, no arguments thr!!!!!!!!!

One tree hill

2006-10-16T23:53:00.000+05:30

Nethin n evrythin in life is relative, it is said n hs been mathematically n logically proved as well. High cn always b higher n wht is far fr one is close fr anothr. 'Here' cn nvr b quite fully defined. 'Here' is only 'here' as long as one is 'here'. Once u go 'thr', 'thr' becomes 'here' n 'here becomes 'thr'. Also, 'up' n 'away' 2 only apply as long as u r 'down' or 'nt away'. Earlier, an absolute ws assumed but later it ws argued tht as thr is no way 2 prove th absolute, it is nt proper 2 assume its very xistence. 'Now' cn only b 'now' fr so long. A microsecond later, it is 'before' or 'some time back'. Freezin time might resolve 'before' n 'after' but cn 'here' n 'thr' b truly resolved? Only if ur frozen or rooted 2 a single spot in space. Wht is space or evn time? It is said tht time xists simply 2 ensure tht all things do nt happen togethr.......... Cn th same b said of space? While time prevents evrythin happenin @ once, space prevents it frm happenin @ th same point. Hwevr, multliple things r allowed 2 happen in th same place, aren't they? But th same cud b said of time. Thr is nothin stoppin many things frm happenin concurrently, is thr? Tht said, it IS impossible fr all 2 happen @ once or @ th same place. As an xample, cn 2 trees rooted on opposite corners of th globe free frm ne sort of outside interference bloom side by side? No they cnt n its simply coz they r separated in space. Likewise, summer n winter cnt evr co-xist fr th simple reason tht they r polar opposites. It still is true hwevr tht thr is no absolute (thr is tht damn word again!!!!!) limitation on all events occurin @ th same time n place xcept fr limitations in time n space.............

Trash

2006-10-14T20:27:00.000+05:30

N thn u turn arnd n thr it ws all th time, behind u. Ur lookin fr somethin tht ws always right under ur nose. Wasn't thr a saying 'lookin fr a needle in a haystack'? Well whoevr said tht didn't knw enuff abt hw th world works or more 2 th point, abt ppl. Th best place 2 hide a needle is nt in a haystack but among a lot of othr needles. Th only place whr ppl dnt look whn they r desperately searchin fr somethin they need is in th open, right in front of evry1. No, a thing cn only hide in th deepest, darkest corners, among th shadows n wht nt......... Oh well, if one refuses 2 see wht is in front of em, y go thru th bothr of puttin it in someplace safe? Ironically, wht @ 1st sight seems 2 b th most unsafe place is often th safest simply coz of th way ppl think. So th original saying seems more n more off target. But thn it doesn't specifically say nethin about pitting nethin away. It just sez tht findin a needle in a haystack is hard, time-consuming work. But wudn't u agree tht it wud infinitely harder 2 find th same needle among a huge stack of needles, a needlestack so 2 speak? A freak is best hid a circus, nt in a deserted alley, a star n a galaxy n nt in some obscure corner of th universe. OK, technically speakin, th universe doesn't hv a corner 2 speak of but u gt th idea!!!!!! The universe is supposed 2 hv one of three possible curvatures: elliptic, hyperbolic or flat, th last case of which ws considered separately frm th othrs...............

Play

2006-10-12T01:13:00.000+05:30

Define somethin. Nethin. Wht is a definition neways? Define a definition itself. A definition, by definition is a simple, straightforward description of whtevr its supposed 2 define. Definitions r subjective 2 a fair xtent. Wht may define somethin 2 some1 may nt 2 some1 else or may b incomplete or insufficient. It may require furthr elaboration or xplanation. Cn it evr b true 2 th absolute limits n boundaries? Definite beyond a shadow of doubt? Like a proof in mathematics tht is built up frm th most basic axioms tht r so direct tht they themselves cannot b proved but only tested? Which r universally accepted as th bedrock on which sturdy logical foundations r laid? Define absolution itself. Universal? Nvr false no matter whtevr, whnevr, whoevr, whrevr, hwevr? Somethin tht cnt b proved 2 b th othr way arnd? A false statement always false or perhaps a truth so true it cudnt possibly false? Black n white? Hot n cold? Xtremes? No middle ground? No ambiguity? No dimmer switch, so 2 speak? Oh well........ absolute cud also mean tht with respect 2 which all else is defined. So does outer space fit th definition of bsolute? Cnt quite say, simply fr th reason tht outer space itself is nt itself properly defined yet. Wht else fits th definition? Does nethin indeed evn capture th concept of absoluteness, if evn such a word xists? Or cn it only xist in our imagination, a concept forevr locked away perpetually in our minds, nvr 2 b free in th physical world? A mental concept fr all time, felt by all, yet nvr seen or truly xperienced by ne?

Red water

2006-10-09T12:41:00.000+05:30

U wake up. It's yet anothr day. Anothr day in life. A day like ne othr. A sunny, bright day with no rain or evn th slightest hint of rain or fog or nethin like tht. Nothin cn dampen it in ne way. Come wht may, today is goin 2 go off just right, nt leanin on either side. Just right, just th way it shud b. Xcept tht whn it DOES go off A-OK, it doesn;t feel fine. It almost feels as if somethin is nt quite proper somewhr. As if it shudn't b happenin this way. As if somethin is missin. Wht cud it b? Aftr all, in optimum circumstances, evrythin does go off well, right? Or wrong? Is it evrythin nt supposed 2 b perfectly precise? So well done tht no fault cn b found? Tht it cnt b criticised in ne way? Hw does one evn define perfection? Wht is perfect 2 one may nt b so 2 anothr. A creation of art is usually perfect 2 th maker altho othrs almost always find fault, either thru spite or genuine interest in seein somethin better. So is perfection subjective? Or does it xist in th absolute sense? While v r on it, does evn imperfection xist absolutely? Cn somethin b defined as so horrible tht it is indeed imperfect no matter wht way one looks? Wud it b held up as an xample of absolute imperfection? It cn nvr b indeed known if it is universally agreed upon fr th simple reason tht it is impossible 2 seek th opinion of evry living person. Cn thr b a pure definition? In othr words, is it possible 2 draw a clear line of whr perfection ends n imperfection begins? Or r th 2 so mutually linked tht it is impossible 2 pull them apart?

Shadows

2006-10-02T19:25:00.000+05:30

Bein unaware of th passage of time is somethin tht happens all th time 2 all ppl @ some time or th othr. All of a sudden u realise God knws hw many hrs hv slipped away n ur left stranded. Stuck. N evn if u claim 2 b aware of th passin of time, is it by th tickin hands of a clock or th fallin grains of an hourglass? Or th changin numbers on a digital watch or cellphone? Whtevr happend 2 measurin time by th special moments v hv hd in our life till thn? Was it nt long ago tht v lived our life 2 hv a great time instead of makin great time? It is almost a criminal offence nw 2 slow down once in a while n look back as 2 hf far u hv come. Simply coz no1 hs th time or leisure 2 look back. N so déjà vu is increasingly becomin more n more common. Th feeling u gt tht u hv xperienced or seen whtevr ur xperiencin or seein right nw. It wud of course. Déjà vu tht is. If one cn nvr recall half th time wht one hs gone thru, one will only hv a vague rememberance thusly leadin 2 ......... Is this th only cause or r thr othrs? Prophetic dreams, fr xample? Do v think v hv been thru wht v r goin thru coz v happend 2 c it in a dream once somewhr, sometime? Or does it hv no reason @ all? One of those things in life tht just happen? Without ne plausible rhyme or reason? Somethin tht a poltergeist? A poltergeist is roughly defined as an unknown agent tht acts in mysterious ways. It might, fr xample, cause th table ur lookin @ 2 break in2 2 pieces. Is déjà vu in th same vein? Xcept tht it is mental rather than physical, obviously. Does it evn xist or does th human brain just happen 2 misfire @ times? Does it evn hv ne proper support behind its xistence if it does xist?

Down in a hole

2006-09-29T23:08:00.001+05:30

Breakin out of th mould of th usual jazz, v xamine a particular person nw. As is 2 b xpected, this person ain't 'normal' in th usual sense of th word. Th person is 'outstandin' in some way. Wht way? Well, th person feels all numb n stuff. He is walkin arnd in wht mite seem 2 th unobservant a drug induced haze. Which he is nt in obviously. His vision is blurred n his eyes burn if xcercised fr evn th shortest time. Well, whn thr is a bit of warmth, he feels very hot n whn it is a bit cold, he nearly freezes 2 death. He's unable 2 sleep @ nite. U cud almost say he hs mild insomnia. He always remains uncomfortable. Th only way he cn sleep uneasily is 2 put on th fan @ full blast (which chills him 2 th veins) n thn cover himself up (which warms him so much it counters th act of turnin on th fan). He walks arnd wit a perpetual headache. He keeps wishin he cud b rid of this stupid condition but in his heart of hearts, he knws he cn do little abt it. Y? Simply coz his condition hs no known cure yet. It comes n goes as it pleases. Whtevr he may do, he cannot make it go away completely n properly. He sweats like a pig all twenty four hrs of th day. He is 2 weak 2 walk arnd but @ th same time he cnt just lie down n drift away easily 2 slumberland. Come heat or cold, rain or snow, he always feels th weather is xtreme. N just whn he's abt 2 throw up his hands in despair, like a miracle, he's back 2 normal n wonderin if it hs all been a bad dream. Thn his eyes fall on th calendar n he sees tht a fair number of days r missin frm his life n he knws thn tht it wasn't a dream but infact very real...........

Surfing with the alien

2006-09-27T20:34:00.000+05:30

If u play wit fire, u will gt burnt. Or mayb evn worse. U'll gt badly burnt. Hence b careful newhr near or arnd fire. Thts th idea u gt frm all this, rite? Of course, th more cautious wud say nvr play wit fire @ all. Y evn take th risk of gettin burnt. But wudn't tht create a limitation? If later, one needs 2 work wit fire n gts burnt, wht does th person do? Othr than throwin water on th burn, he doesn't hv much of an option. Simply coz no1 evn bothered 2 touch fire n so no1 knws th remedy fr burns. Th 1st person who discovered fire ws hwevr shunned. They turned him away fr havin such a dangerous thing wit him. So it usually is wit innovators in general. Present somethin new n ppl run away. Whts wit this morbid fear against change? Especially whn it is said tht change is th only constant as such. A self-paradox but true nonetheless. Hw come tried n tested is always valued ovr new steel?In certain situations, this is desirable. Introducin new stuff without proper checkin whethr it is all it is made out 2 b is rash, nt smart. Thr is a thin line between bein smart n careless just as thr is a thin line between genius n insanity. Most geniuses come across as 'different' altho each n evry person is 'different' in their own way. U nvr knw if n whn u crossed th line in2 madness. Sometimes, madness itself is a form of genius, such is th weird nature of th world. Wht do u do in such a case? If u dnt evn knw if th line xists, hwevr do u figure out hw 2 cross a non-xistent line? Speakin of non-xistent lines, it hs bn proved tht our eyes cn actually c invisible things. This is neither th time nor th place 2 demonstrate but it cn b done. N so goes invisibility down th drain.............

Pennyroyal tea

2006-09-23T00:59:00.000+05:30

Nething, netime, newhr!!!!!! No stupid hidden patterns or othrwise. Infact TOTAL randomness!!!!!!!!! Nothin makes th least amount of sense whtsoevr!!!!!!! Its funny, isn't it? Tyin up ur hair aftr u hv hd a bath, assumin u hv long hair of course!!!!! Or do u wrap it up in a towel? I hv no idea @ all. U gt 50 inspirations whn ur nt quite in ur head. Nethin cn happen, newhr n @ netime hehehehehehe. Like I said, totally nonsensical. Optimum brain damage material muhahahahahahaha. Nvr take tension, give tension 2 othrs!!!!! Randomness hd been mentioned some time earlier. N it definitely comes in2 play here. Lengthenin a post is nt easy especially whn u keep usin short forms evry few words. N substitute phonetic equivalents fr parts of words. Wht do u do in such cases? Fifty diferent ways 2 commit suicide? Or wht? some1 urgin u 2 hurry up n finish whn all u wanna do is njoy th feeling ur xperiencing. But if th othr person hs th ownership of th key article or thing ur usin, ur in a quandary. Do u choose 2 njoy th moment n risk offendin th othr person or do u please him n lose th simple beauty u wer goin thru? Or wht? do u evn hv ne othr options????????? List ways of passin time. Tht wud include sleepin, wastin time, findin new ways of wastin time, lazin arnd, goofin off, TV, th Net, music, roamin th city etc. Tht of course applies mainly 2 th species of ppl called 'collegus studentus familiaris'. Is tht scientific name listed here evn required? Or is it just plain embellishment 2 pep up an othrwise dull proposition as many fancy things r today? Simply eye candy in othr words?

Strange

2006-09-20T23:19:00.000+05:30

Rolling friction is th least. Static friction is th highest. Dynamic friction falls somewhr in between. So it is accordin 2 physics. 2 put it simply, it takes th most energy 2 gt somethin movin. It takes lesser energy 2 keep it movin. Of course, once it is rolling, almost no force is required 2 keep it th way. So also cn b said abt many things othr than movement. Ne original work fr xample. It all begins with some sort of inspiration or initial push 2 gt th mind tickin. Thr mite b art which just happened but if u look carefully, thr is always some1 or somethin tht inspired it in th 1st place. Tht 1st idea which is th main foundation behind th creation tht follows influences it najorly or minorly. It cud b somethin as simple as a leaf driftin away in th wind or it cud somethin as complicated as a breakup of an affair. Th best art is often th most personal. It is funny sometimes whn u think abt it tht th things tht seem 2 hv an actual 'xistence' r usually abstract. A single thot or emotion often feels more 'real' than a house standin b4 us in th flesh. Th most talked abt topic, Fate naturally rears it head here. Does it evn hv an 'xistence' 2 speak of? Cn v evn talk abt th xistence of somethin so abstract? Wht do v evn mean by sayin tht somethin 'xists'? Tht it is 'thr'? Or is it 2 abstract a definition itself? Is somethin more concrete needed? Hw thn do v define xistence? It cannt mean somethin materialistic coz thn tht wud mean nethin abstract hs no xistence............

Driving at night

2006-09-19T19:55:00.000+05:30

Do somethin this way. Dnt do it tht way. Y nt? Coz its simpler this way or may this is th tried n tested method. Wht if it is done th othr way? Its on ur head thn. A typical conversation this hs been between one in th know n one who desn't knw or doesn't know fully. Or perhaps some1 wit a new idea in their head. Or some1 just tired of doin things th same way. Rules r set down fr a reson they say. Yep. N th reason is 2 b broken. Ne restrictions u put on urself will always control u n limit ur perception of things. U wud b blinkered. N hw? By ur own regulations, thts wht. Mayb u shud set certain safety guidelines or whtevr but thr IS somethin called narrowin down ur viewpoint. Breakin rules on th oth hand fr no proper reason shud also b avoided of course. If ur nt gonna make somethin new outta ur mess, u may as well stay within th prescribed limits. Just as thr is some called narrowin ur views 2 much, thr is also somethin called hidin 2 well. If thr is nothin suspicious goin on arnd a normal lookin spot, nt evn leaves rustlin or insects hummin, by common sense, it wud naturally arouse suspicions, wudnt it? It wud 2 ne sane person is all I'm sayin. Pine needles breakin under ur feet as u walk is always a giveaway 2 ppl u wanna catch redhanded. Wht does one do in such a case? Carry a broom n sweep th path b4 u as u walk it? But tht wud create evn more noise, wudn't it? N tht wud leave u back @ square one. Bein back 2 th beginning whn ur nearly done all bcoz of some simple error tht ws overlooked or nt realised is really irritating. All tht cn b done is 2 start over. It is said tht thr is nothin more unsatisfactory thn 2 hv th foundation give way whn th work is completed n done. Which hs happend simply coz th foundaion simply wasn't researched well enuff. A building 2 wud give way if its own foundation wasn't done well. Th bedrock of evrythin. Th most important but often th most overlooked bit. Wht r v doin studyin th fundamentals whn v already knw th subject is th opinion of most ppl. Or sometimes they r ignored all togethr. But if u dnt start @ th bottom hw r u supposed 2 reach th top eh? Fly thr? While tht is possible in th real world, it isn't in th abstract world of thoughts n stuff. U cn only proceed one step @ a time n th only way 2 shorten ur misery is 2 discover some sort of shortcut. Thr mite b many mistaken trails but th only way on is forward. Keep goin on n on. Of course keep goin on only if thrs some meaning..............

Crowd chant

2006-09-18T19:46:00.000+05:30

Fate. Ur bein led arnd by some1 or somethin thru ur life, so goes th popular view. God doesn't play dice with th universe ws stated by some1 nt quite recalled nw. so apparently, evrythin in its own small way is movin towards some definite goal is th logical conclusion. Naturally, it raises questions abt free will n if it evn hs meaning in a world as described above. Coz simply put, if our evry action is pre-ordained n foreseen, hw cn v make a choice? This subject hs been xtensively discussed in many places includin th Net, movies, music n literature. Wht unique insights cn b brought in2 hearing which hvnt been covered elsewhr? Is thr nethin evn left 2 discuss on this sad topic? Somehw it doesn't feel right 2 think tht a topic hs been covered so extensively tht thrs nothin new left in it 2 b uncovered. Is it evn true tht a topic is no longer discussed simply bcoz it hs been done 2 death? Does tht automatically imply tht it is finished n v need nt worry ourselves abt it ne longer? So it ws said whn Newton discovered th theory of gravity but it ws superseded by Einstein's theory of relativity. Nw th latest attempts r @ combining relativity n quantum mechanics. A grand unified theory or GUT is supposed 2 b th outcome. A theory of evrythin in sight or perhaps, evn xistence. It is said tht scientists fear th day whn such a theory is completed coz they feel it wud ned all human thot simply coz it cud in theiyr predict evrythin tht cud evr happen within a reasonable degree of error. Seems doubtful somehw tht such a theory cud evn xist. Isn't thr a certain randomness inherent in evrythin? Evn considering tht th theory wud hv errors, wud tht b sufficient 2 cover all of th randomness present? Or uwd it nt? Tht later on, a new xplanation wud b required 2 clear away th randomness or atleast make it clearer? This wud b a refinement of th earlier theory, wudn't it? N will this cycle evr stop? Of continuous refinement or does it hv an end? a true end whr thr is no need fr furthr clarity? A position of crystal clear ideas, in short?

Travelling light

2006-09-17T00:02:00.000+05:30

They say if u r pushed 2 do somethin n u dnt wanna do it, u usually fall flat on ur face. On th othr hand, nethin done with passion always goes off well if nt necessarily succeed. N so Da Psycho Blogger is rite nw tryin 2 do somethin which is near impossible fr him n tht is actually put down somethin abt himself n try 2 do it in a clear, simple way without ne of th customary sick twisting or confusion or th usual convoluted mess tht forms as a result of his efforts 2 write on a specific topic. He hs been criticised of changin topics in evry sentence, bein cryptic 2 th point of meaninglessness, needin a course in 'proper' English and writin incoherently without ne flow. Quite simply, he's least bothered by all of this. No1 ws forced 2 go thru his ramblings or comment on em. N if ppl hate him fr it, it is nt his problem. He never minded whether he ws liked or nt. Quite simply, he doesnt 'give a damn' as he puts it. Rock music, sleepin n wastin time r some of his most important ways 2 waste time. Of course, postin frm time 2 time his random thots is also a top feature on tht list. Researchin new n more effective ways 2 waste time is his greatest scientific breakthrough. Comin up wit more n more horrible rubbish whnevr he hs spare time is his favourite way of passin time whn he's 2 lazy 2 waste time hehehehe. Engagin ne1 he meets in a battle of words or more 2 th point, a battle of trash is th only form of battle he knows or recognises. Obviously, b4 sparring, potential opponents r carefully screened 2 ensure tht they r up2 his standards so tht he doesnt hv 2 waste his time needlessly. Think tht is enuff info revealed fr nw.............

Legit freak

2006-09-12T23:51:00.000+05:30

Who will u b? Who will I b? Wht does th future truly hold? Will tomorrow evr come evn tho it nvr dies? Or is it just an illusion? It cn b argued tht today is th tomorrow of yesterday n tht today is tomorrow's yesterday while yesterday is quite simply, yesterday!!!!!!!!!! Wait a minute. Wht is bein talked abt here? Is it time itself, tht thing which is always thr but nvr quite enuff or is it somethin abstract?????? Well, 2 b honest Im nt quite sure. Tomorrow hs many definitions in different situations actually. Th one quoted above is th simplest one. But it cn also stand fr th future in general rangin frm a few days 2 a few months, years, decades, centuries or mayb evn aeons. As stated, different definitions in different situations. But does it always mean th future? Cn it stand fr somethin othr than wht is goin 2 happen? Cn it stand fr th past, fr xample? Impossible. Aftr all tomorrow by definition hs nt yet come. So hw cn it stand fr th past which hs already happened? Hw abt if u were talkin abt somethin further back in th past n referred 2 somethin in th more recent past? Wudnt tht make th latter event in th tomorrow of th former event? Do u evn understand whr this is all leadin? A deeper discussion of th very nature of time perhaps. Time. Tht one word probably holds more importance than all other words put together. Simply because it labels a quantity tht unlike othr quantities, cnt b stored fr later usage nor cn it b turned back. While thr r assumptions abt time turnin back called dreamtime, they r nt yet fully verified. While current theories imply tht time travel 2 th past is possible, it hs nt yet been actually done. Currently, time is regarded th 4th dimension of our universe but it is th sole dimension tht doesnt hv a negative. While always plentiful, it is nevertheless in permanent short supply. Time wasted once is always gone. A particularly hard concept fr human brains 2 grasp fully evn whn grown up. Time hs many subtle nuances tht cn hardly b captured in this small space n r better left fr othr, more sensible (sic) ppl 2 elaborate on. Me, I leave u here 2 ponder abt th various little things nt touched upon here.............

Thriller

2006-09-03T02:51:00.000+05:30

So, wht r v gonna talk abt today? Is it yet anothr abstract topic tht hs been lurkin arnd in th depths n labyrinths of my brain? Or is it somethin tht surfaced in my thots so powerfully tht I hd no choice but 2 gt it out? Hmm..............well I cnt say it hs been thr fr ne proper amount of time. On th othr hand it didnt threaten 2 throw my mental state in2 disarray if nt uncaged either. See, fr a change it concerns a person. Wht do u mean, I hear u ask. A person?????? Hw cn u post on a person????? Whn sanity sets in somewht u wud probably ask y this person in particular? Y nt some1 else? Wht does this person hv tht so many othr ppl I knw lack? Or cud it b tht person lacks somethin tht evry1 else hs? Or wht is it tht tht person makes it here whn thr mite b so many more deserving individuals mayb out thr? Lemme c..............Well th reason fr selectin ne person is tht fr some reason they stand out in some way, th so called 'outstanding' ppl. They mite b th most studious, th most talkative, th most mischievous or th most somethin else. Yeah, Im nt gonna stick 2 th goody 2 shoes kinda ppl who r th teacher's pet, who gt th best grades, who stay locked in their rooms fr 24 hrs a day n in general dnt hv a life beyond academics. They r th ones who gt their names put up on th notice boards n th institute's old records n stuff like tht. Which reminds me, y shud only studious ppl gt recognised n gt all th awards n accolades? Hw cn u say tht a student is bright or othrwise if u dnt hv a dud 2 compare him with? Continuing in th same vein, hw cn u say somethin is light if thr is no dark? Thr cn b no day without night, no short without long, no right without wrong. In general nothin xists without an equal (sometimes unequal) n opposite equivalent. N so doesnt it become abundantly clear tht th supposed 'utopia' or 'perfect world' full of joy n happiness n completely free of evil is a false belief? If so wht r all th saints n holy men blabberin away abt? Clear urself of evil they say n th world will b free of evil. But our above xploration clearly makes it certain tht such a world is nt meant 2 b. So th supposed main purpose in our live which is 2 work towards this perfect world is completely n utterly lost!!!!!!! Wht is our purpose in life thn? 2 knw ourselves? Or wht? 2 knw somethin deeper?

Dangerous

2006-08-28T20:49:00.000+05:30

N so today Im gonna discuss a very specific thing in my post which Im typin nw. It concerns 'it'. Wht is 'it'? Well, 'it' is welcomed by all n sundry n also hated by all n sundry. Quite th paradox isnt it? Hw cn one thing evoke such opposin emotions in a person u mite ask. Well, nt only is it possible, 'it' DOES evoke such reactions out of each n evry1. Ppl use 'it' as a last option but whn 'it' is nt available, they go in2 a flurry of emotional displays which cn range frm runnin arnd here n thr in a desparate hurry 2 lookin arnd in a mad frenzy tryin 2 search 'it' out or one of its many fellows. They wudnt like 2 use 'it' if thrs an option but as a last resort 'it' is grudgingly tolerated.......... Nethin more specific do I hear u askin? Well, 'it' is seen in many places rangin frm dirty side streets 2 nice big hotels n discos n stuff like tht.............. U knw wht Im talkin abt................ Oh u still dnt? Hmm............let me c if I cn throw some light on this situation dudes. Its nt easy I tell u, givin out clues n nt bein 2 clear tht it is 2 easy. Damn, Im nt @ all ne gud @ this!!!!!!!! Infact 2 tell th truth I suck big time!!!!!!!! But thn only a coward gives up without evn tryin rite hehehehehehe. Yeah so gettin back 2 our original topic, 'it' gives a huge sense of relief 2 whoevr uses it but also a great sense of disgust @ havin used it. Most ppl who use 'it' decide in their minds NEVER 2 evr use it again. Life is nt so fair unfortunately n many ppl end up havin 2 use 'it' again!!!!!!!!!! Yeah life cn b a real bitch @ times but thn if it wasnt hw cud v label it life dudes??????? Wudnt u agree? Da Psycho Blogger signs off nw havin given u some food fr thot............

Thin air

2006-08-26T23:57:00.000+05:30

Hmm............. as th time hs passed so does th direction seem 2 hv changed. And th funny obsession of ppl 2 make evrythin 'official' whtevr tht is supposed 2 mean. I dnt knw wht it means n Im nt gonna bother 2 find out. 2 much of a pain fr somethin tht mite nt evn mean nethin 2 me or b useful in ne way rite? Nw while u may b thinkin tht this decision hs been taken in haste let us xplore th whole idea of makin somethin 'official'. Thr r so many definitions of makin one thing official. One xample cud b whn u need 2 hv a written delaration of whtevr happend. A stamped paper so 2 speak, a proper document which cn b presented as proof later.......... Tht ws one way. Anothr way cud b whn u do somethin tht is nt normally done or 2 put it more clearly somethin tht does nt need 2 b done. Thr r several xamples of things of this sort. Wht cn b said is tht a silent understandin hs been reached fr which thr is no need of words. N yet one of th concerned parties may come out n address th issue directly just 2 make it 'official'. Thr is tht damned word again!!!!!!!!!! But nt very surprising if u consider wht v r tryin 2 tackle here................ R thr ne othr ways of makin somethin 'official'? Hmm.................... thinkin abt it yields no rewards atleast nt nw n nw is th only time. Aftr all it is said tht th nw is th nw only nw isnt it hehehehehe. Th nw ws th future a moment ago n will become th past a moment frm nw...................Nw whr were v? Aah nw...........................

Book of dreams

2006-08-23T00:06:00.000+05:30

Like I care. Im comfortable in my own skin n I dnt care who knws abt it. I cnt b wht othr ppl want me 2 b. I cn only b wht I am which is me. Oh dnt worry I aint writin a poem or song or nethin. Th rhymin sing song style of th 1st few lines ws pure coincidence thts all nothin else. Oh y oh y r abandoned places so attractive? Broken down walls, trees growin thru th cracks, a few panes of glass feebly hangin in th windows, some scattered n shattered pale tiles on th roof tht were once red n new, some remanants of human habitation still left over like mayb an old beam tht once held a swing, rain drippin thru th roof................ These places r becomin increasingly rare 2 find, difficult or evn illegal 2 access, dangerous 2 xplore coz u nvr knw whn th roof or th wall may fall on ur head, lonely n abandoned by ppl who once lived within those very walls or hd a workin life thr. Today, th pyramids of th industrial revolution just uselessly stand in the way, they're a scar in th landscape. Th deafening noises hve been replaced by silence, but if u listen carefully they will tell you their story. Abandoned hospitals where you can still smell the anxiety of th ill, where you can hear the coughing of th infected and where once doctors and nurses walked thru th shiny corridors. A hundred yr old hotel, standing proudly at th waterfront, arrogantly overlooking th beach and fiercely withstanding all the storms of the past century, a decayed symbol of wealth for th rich. Y I ask again r abandoned places so attractive?

Engines of creation

2006-08-19T23:01:00.000+05:30

Well u walk arnd lookin fr some peace n quiet n spend some time wit urself. N u just cnt find it. Whrevr u go thrs some disturbance or th othr. Ppl talkin in loud voices, vehicles honkin, animals tht cnt keep quiet, industrial noise or ne othr source of noise. Thrs certainly no shortage of such things in today's concrete jungles v call cities which r home 2 th urban ppl. Well but wht if th problem is different? Wht if no matter hw hard u look u cnt find th source of th splinter in ur mind? Which is causin u 2 lose track of wht u need 2 concentrate? Wht if th source of disturbance is within u n nt without? Well wht wud u do thn? U wud try 2 find inner peace whtevr tht is supposed 2 mean. U calm ur mind n make it empty n blank. Only problem is whn u try 2 make it blank all of th thots u evr hd seem 2 rush in @ th same time till ur head is ready 2 xplode. N 2 think u started tryin 2 make it free of ne n all thots hahahahahahahaha. Th answer is simple really. Stop tryin 2 free ur mind. Ur locked away in it fr eternity n th key hs been thrown away since u were born. U r a prisoner 2 ur mind n tht is hw it will stay forevr!!!!!!!! Proof 2 th contrary? Well prove tht ur nt a prisoner n thn v will c wht cn b done abt it. But u mite say none of this shakes ur belief tht 2 n 2 make 4. Ur quite right xcept only in xceptional cases n its only in xceptional cases tht it is nt certain whethr a certain animal is a dog or a length is equal 2 a meter. 2 n 2 of somethin is definitely 4 of somethin but this axiom is useless unless applied. 2 dogs n 2 dogs r 4 dogs but if ur uncertain abt if all 4 r dogs. Well u say thr r atleast 4 animals. But animal is itself nt clearly defined. So u say thr r 4 living organisms. Howevr thr r viruses n stuff like tht which r on th boundary of living n non living. U r thn driven 2 say thr r 4 entities. Whn u r clear wht u mean by entity v cn resume th argument..........................

Attack

2006-08-18T23:25:00.000+05:30

It always happens @ sometime or th othr. Somethin tht u hdnt xpected @ all or hd xpected but were hopin wudnt happen happend. Wht do u do in such cases? Do u sit down n mope till ur tired of bein broken down n go back 2 ur life but perhaps nt th same as b4 n havin learnt somethin valuable frm wht happend or just th same as u always were or evn permanently scarred by th xperience? Wht wud u possibly learn frm it neways? Tht ur approach 2 th situation ws wrong or th timin ws wrong or tht u did evrythin right but it wsnt fated 2 succeed? Well in ne of th mentioned cases wht is ur response? In th 1st case u realise u need 2 mayb do things differently or atleast this particular thing whtevr it may b. Case 2 requires tht u rethink ur policy of rushin in2 things or doin th opposite n waitin till th 11th hour n mediate between th 2. In th 3rd case its nt in ur hands 2 do nethin @ all. It cn b truly said tht unexpected things happen unexpectedly. If it involves anothr person it cn also b tht u didnt understand th person properly or s/he didnt react accordingly or whtevr. Basically they may also b responsible or evn solely responsible. Hw or wht is th best way 2 lift heavy things? Dnt knw meself 2 b honest. Some1 suggested I use them coz they hd become 2 obese frm sittin endlessly in front of th idiot box which cn b alternately put as they hd become a couch potato. Nt th I completely agree. Whoevr said tht u cn decide on one opinion ws seriously mistaken. N yet it is also said tht 2 many cooks spoil th broth. Hmm.................. U shudnt decide on a single opinion but often it is th better or evn more proper alternative. Evn askin 2 or 3 ppl becomes a pain in th ass. Simply coz evry1 offers their own point of view n leave u muddled n confused n nt havin understood evn a single alternative. Which is y u nvr consult ne1 or atleast only trusted ppl whn ur in th situation described @ th beginning of havin faced somethin unexpected. Aftr all ths only so much u cn plan ahead for............................

Stingray

2006-08-16T23:25:00.000+05:30

Coz I think th storm is settin in. Im cold, frightened, scared, afraid n abt 2 shit in my pants I guess!!!!!!!! Oh this is gettin gud isnt it. I sure do think so. Stars flyin in my head n Ive gt twenty ways 2 go. Im feelin high. Ur trapped in a dream n u cnt evn yell coz no1 cn hear u. Is this nightamre evr gonna stop? Nt netime soon Im afraid. Ur bein chased down a dead end road n u knw u cnt gt away. Thr ws a time whn evythin ws right n faces appeared in th sky, hope ws as real as th air. Howevr its night nw n time 2 sleep. Home is a place where u can hide, a shelter away from other's eyes, a sanctuary in the ground, where a measure of love can be found. Home is where u return to die. Spread your arms and fly upon the wings of a hurricane. Step outside the race for a day, let your mind roam free to where you'd like yourself to be. Dream escape but never get away. Ur gonna run; u promised u wud. Ud break the ties, if only you could. The lines on your hand like rivers that flow can't change from where they have to go............................ Think Ive made enuff of th imagery fr nw n Ill leave it thr till I cn think of sometthin more. Writin deep stuf tht creates images in ur mind as u read it is nt easy n besides it is gud only if done well enuff. Othrwise u may as well do it inside ur head if u only wanna please urself. Bein a guy who works in public u mite as well keep th viewers or readers or whtevr happy or @ th very least impress em. Pretendin they r nt thr only drives em away n they nvr return. N if u dnt care in th 1s place u hv no right 2 complain tht they ran away @ all. U wer th one who didnt bother 2 include em in wht u were doin.......................Hey I forgot, no free advice here!!!!!!!!! Well nw thts its already written Im 2 lazy 2 remove it.

Shindig

2006-08-15T19:59:00.000+05:30

Application of science in daily life. All of science is useless unless ppl cn find a use fr it or in othr words an application fr it. Which is y it is said tht mathematics despite bein th queen of sciences is th most useless study evr undertaken by man. Y? Coz it hs no application xcept in very obscure areas. But wht xactly do v understand by application here? An elaborate xplanation fr y things happen th way thy happen n nt ne othr way? Or y things shudnt happen th way they did happen? Like xplanations fr magic or somethin? Those r more mystic than scientific. So wht is it thn? It hs myriad interpretations actually. Of course different ppl take it differently n prefer different views. Who cares really? Try 2 look in2 a REAL use fr science in ur life n u cn c it almost evrywhr. Y evn th most stupid things in life like y v xist cn b answered. Fr xample th reason v xist is simple; its just evolution. Take a solar cooker fr xample. It works just because by principle it shud. Forhet tht fr nw n think abt more creative uses fr it. Hw abt xplanations fr y 90% of us waste so much of time evryday n evrytime evn whn v knw v cnt afford 2 waste ne time @ all nt evn a second? Try xplainin tht. Most ppl just mumble tht it is because ppl r like tht. But thn y r ppl like tht? Cn v xplain y ppl move, think n act th way they do n nt like wild monkeys in th forest? Is it coz v cn supposedly 'reason'??????? N whr is th proof tht animals act only on instinct n cnt reason out things? This is gettin a bit 2 shitty evn fr me so lemme come back wit somethin better later.............

Heavy fuel

2006-08-13T16:30:00.000+05:30

2 many delays, 2 many problems, nt enuff time etc etc etc. Wht does all this mean? Cud mean nethin frm apples 2 oranges. Or it cud mean v hv 2 separate th basis variables n differentiate them separately 2 gt th final answer. Well, it surely means v hv a long way 2 go 2 go whrevr v want 2 or need 2 go. Take a partial differential membrane tht accepts only ur destination, integrate wit respect 2 th world n differentiate wit respect 2 whr u need 2 go n ur thr!!!!!!!! Or else u cn apply Heisenberg's uncertainity principle which states tht @ large enuff scales thr is a certain fuzziness in ur xact location which means u may alredy b @ ur destination so thrs no need 2 travel @ all!!!!!! Yet anothr approach is run away frm th destination which will move towards u by direct application of Newton's Third Law. Heres th scientific way. Suppose goin thr conventionally will take u 2 much time which u dnt hv. So hw do u gt thr quickly????? Simple. U create a crinkle in th space-time continuum n Zap! u reach thr in a fraction of th time required normally, mayb evn a fraction of a second. Science fiction? But thn fact is stranger than fiction, friend. Some of th above is true n some of it is nt. I leave it 2 u 2 decide which is which. Nt tht it matters really. But heres somethin 2 make it interestin. List down 3 things each of wht u like n wht u spike. Done it? OK, forget abt it n move on 2 th nxt sentence. Did u do th previous xcercise or nt? U didnt? Do it rite nw or else u wnt njoy th remainder of th post. U did it? Thts a gud guy/gal. Nw leave it aside n read on 2 find tht this post hs ended.

October

2006-08-07T14:17:00.000+05:30

Evr waited fr somethin SO badly tht if u didnt gt it ud die n thn u fucked up @ th most vital stage n sweated it out fr until th results came out n found u did well n infact wer a topper or atleast one of th toppers n thn jumped arnd till ur feet hurt n u cudnt lift ur arm n hd 2 lie down fr an hour n thn u decided 2 party till it ws dawn n ordered a great deal of drink n drank till ur cheeks flamed n ur stomah gurgled n sloshed till it made u dizzy 2 just get up but u went ahead regardless of th circumstances n gt really fucked n hd 2 c a doctor th nxt day which wasnt xactly th fine ending u hd anticipated 2 ur big party but which ws wht u gt fr bein a bit overboard or in lay language careless but u were still so jubiliant tht u didnt wanna stop but u hd 2 rein urself in coz u were nt free th nxt day which of course refers 2 th day u woke frm ur hangover n nt necessarily th nxt day in chronological order (hey I cnt keep it 2 straightforward nw cn I?) n hd 2 go 2 work or attend classes or whtevr n so wit great regret u held back n decided 2 do somethin 2 distract urself wit th only problem bein tht evrythin reminded u of partyin till u nearly dropped dead yes evn th goldfish swimmin arnd in th bowl which wer unknown 2 Mom n Dad actually newly bought last nite coz in ur drunken bawl u accidentally threw th old ones out th window coz they irritated u just swimmin arnd in their bowl aimlessly without ne purpose n so u just fished them out n heartlessly threw them out th window so tht u cud have ur peace but aftr comin 2 ur senses u realised ur folks wud b pissed off n so u ran out 2 th local market n gt new ones which again started swimmin aimlessly in their bowl but u didnt look @ them @ all coz u werent sure u cud control urself n thanked ur stars tht th shop ws open @ this hour but nvr thot tht Mom n Dad r smarter than they look n caught u neways n grounded u fr a month fr havin puked inside th bathroom n thn u sat down n cursed urself fr havin partied so hard n havin gotten in2 this mess n thn decided tht it wudve been better if u hd nvr participated in whtevr u won n thus decided tht all of life ws a connected chain which cud nvr b broken?

Blast

2006-08-04T14:09:00.000+05:30

Funny things happen whn u wanna sit down somewhr peaceful n think n ur busy. Coz th irony is whn u DO gt ur peace n manage 2 gt away frm it all u somehw just cnt think n sometimes cnt evn remember wht u were supposed 2 think ovr @ all!!!!!!!!! N very often whn u REALLY think fr some reason all u cn come up wit r fuckin life theories, each more idiotic than th last. Oh yeah n philosophy, LOTS of it. On th othr hand if u do wanna ACTUALLY think try walkin arnd on a busy street wit a huge number of vehicles n ppl shoutin 2 b heard. Wht does all of this mean? It means xactly wht it is supposed 2 mean. Wht happens 2 us in daily life hs been simply noted down here thts all. If u dnt agree, just try it out urself. N y is it bein put down here neways????????? A set of life xperiences? Is tht wht this blog is becomin? Hell no. Nt yet thankfully. Coz all of th above is just some bullshit tht came up n pushed its way thru th othr krap in thr. Wht wud b th shape of chairs if our knees bent th othr way? Ppl say u shudnt worry abt such things coz thr r more serious problems. One is tht if our knees bent th othr way, v wud b sittin on ur dicks which wud b a very painful proposition. Th upside is v dnt need 2 shift uncomfortably 2 fart. But leavin this stinky topic aside, let us look elsewhr fr material. Imagine bein so confused u cnt tell right frm wrong, or ur teeth frm ur toes. Thn if ur nose runs n ur feet smell, wud u believe ur built upside down??????????? Strange implications arent they hehehehehehe.......................

Rotten apple

2006-08-03T13:11:00.000+05:30

Just whn u think life cnt gt ne worse it does. If nethin cn go wrong it will. All different versions of Murphy's law which is th only law tht seems 2 apply consistently 2 our lives hehehehehe. Ironic isnt it tht whn life is supposed 2 b gud n shit like tht th only TRUE law is somethin tht states evrythin cn go wrong whn u least xpect it???????? So th ugly side of life is th only true side eh? 2 bad coz tht means tht assholes like me WILL hv our place in th spotlight @ sometime or th othr............. Bodes badly fr th soothsayers n fortunetellers nw doesnt it? Muhahahahahahahaha. Upsettin th theory of relativity or mayb evn th theory of gravity is gonna feel REAL gud............. A new world order whr evrythin is only rubbish, krap, trash n othr assorted terms 2 numerous 2 list here. Whr ppl xchange insults, inanities n othr items of interest. Frightenin prospect isnt it? N yet if u look @ it carefully it is infact quite humorous. Nay its evn ironic. Kinda like Einstein statin tht World War III will b fought wit stones again like primitive man. A loop, circle or nethin u wanna call it. Just means tht evrythin comes back 2 its (humble) beginnings. Or does it? Th Universe began frm a cosmic egg called th Big Bang but as of nw its nt clear if it will also end up tht way in a Big Crunch. Evn Murphy's Law cnt b applied here coz its nt certain which is th 'bad' alternative. An endlessly xpandin Universe or an endlessly oscillatin Universe th xpands n contracts again n again. N if Murphy's Law b taken @ face value thn bad is th only true thing n gud only xists coz of bad needin an equal opposite...................... No I cnt carry on further. Ive alredy revealed 2 much!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rooster

2006-08-01T12:56:00.000+05:30

Seems nowadays all tht is written abt here is nothin. Abstraction, nowhr n bullshit like tht. N u knw wht I agree!!!!!!!! This is pushin th limits of meaninglessness n infact very quickly approachin insanity.............. Wht wud fire up a mind in circumtances like this?????????? Who knws th answer? I mean th proper answer tht wud work fr evry1 coz each person hs his/her own way of dealin wit nt bein able 2 think. Some like me drink themselves 2 death. Some more unique ppl go fr hash or weed or somethin like tht. N some evn more unique ppl harass othrs 2 gt their creatve juices flowin. Wht abt th act of bloggin? Does it come under ne of th above mentioned categories? Nt sure if it does. Agreed tht evry1 who read ur blog h 2 read wht uve put down bnut thn no1 is forced 2 read it nw r they? So its a kinda grey area. Ur naggin othr ppl but nt forcefully so it cnt b xactly classified as naggin ppl coz they r @ absolute freedom 2 walk away n just ignore u arent they? Funny tht v r talkin abt firin up a mind tht is unable 2 think whn all it CAN think abt evn whn its functionin properly is xactly nothin or @ th best rubbish. Repetition seems 2 b creepin n again doesnt it? Sometimes all u need fr inspiration is a sight tht mite last just abt half a second. N mayb u mite nt gt isnpired evn aftr seein an entire film or ne othr activity tht lasts fr well ovr an hour. U knw wht I mean............. Does this xplain y different ppl gt outta their rut in different ways? Coz they r stimulated differently? Or is thr some deeper reason behind it? Is it coz evry1 is unique in their own way? Tht no 2 ppl r xactly alike n tht is includin identical twins? Difference. Means different things 2 different ppl...................

Estranged

2006-07-30T14:40:00.000+05:30

Whn ur in th grip of somethin, infact nethin tht is so powerful tht it grips u n doesnt let go wht do u do? U luk arnd fr th largest set of pliers u cn find thts wht!!!!!!!! Sorry I meant inverse pliers 2 free u. Wht u thot tht fr a change I ws gonna put in wht cud actually b happenin 2 me or wht? Perish th thot!!!!!!!! I aint in th grips of nethin or else I wud b incapable of writin nethin @ all. Th very fact btht Im here fillin up this post is proof thth Im OK. Neways leavin aside th way I function lets luk @ th way normal ppl function. Fr an xample tht I dnt function normally whn I leave my hair open I sweat less than whn I tie it up. Wht u dint knw tht I hv long hair? But thn psychos n grad students just dnt hv netime fr petty things like goin 2 th barber. Stereotyped image tht of a tech student bein a caffeine addicted ponytailed t shirt shorts n sneakers types or evn of a lawyer bein a liar who is only in it fr th money. Whtevr. Injectin humor in2 evry aspect of ur life is a gud way of makin life worth livin.'Tis said tht despite th high cost of livin it remains popular............. wonder y!!!!!!!! Usually an xpensive thing is shunned fr a less costly alternative. N dying just requires a small box of pills or evn cheaper a tolen gun. Just walk in2 th nearest gun store, ask fr a gud one (b sure 2 research this 1st or u mite die a long, painful death or evn worse nt die @ all so b also sure 2 luk up vital points in th human body assumin ur human or else luk up th appropriate guide fr whichevr alien form u r) n just blow urself away!!!!!!!!!! Or if u wanna go out wit a bang just hv some old adversary kill u in front of a big stadium filled wit ppl or in a somewht crowded street dependin on hw many witnesses u want!!!!!!!! N y is it tht Im advisin suicide all of a sudden? No Im nt. Just layin out all th facts b4 u n respectin ur rite as a consumer 2 knw evrythin. In short th bare naked truth n thts all. Coz u knw wht they say, knowledge IS power aftr all..............

Faint

2006-07-26T20:04:00.000+05:30

And so th seasons change n a new day dawns n evrything rolls ovr in2 a new age or whtevr, whnevr, whrevr. 2 many options, 2 many ways tht intersect n shit like tht. 2 many cooks spoil th broth they say. Forensics hs changed ordinary ppl in2 th present day Sherlock Holmes. With new technology, cyborgs are fast becomin a reality. Whtevr is supposd 2 b covered here??????? Nt quite sure as of nw. All roads lead somewhr rite? So just keep on movin n who knws whr u mite end up? Its nt needed 2 always hv a map in hand whn u go out xplorin. No I wnt say life's borin withou a little risk coz Ive probably alredy said it earlier n evn if I hvnt othr ppl hv n I prefer originality. Well fr those of u who feel tht thrs 2 much repitition here nowadays I cn only say thr is no proper rating system fr repitition which decides hw much IS repition n hw much is just emphasis on somethin rite? So no1 cn sue me, nt yet. Accordin 2 Murphy's Law if nethin cn go wrong it will. A corollary is tht if things r goin well u hv overlooked somethin. Followin this longer v realise tht if evrythin is goin just as it shud somethin WILL go wrong somewhr soon enuff. N it happens all th time n hs also happend 2 u so thrs no point in denyin it. U knw wht happens if u butter a cat's back n it falls? Does it fall oon its back or on its feet? One school of thot wud say it falls on its back by Murphy's Law. Th othr group wud say it falls on its feet as cats always fall on their feet. Actually it wud fall on its feet n thn lick off th butter. This hs been proved thru actual xperimentation. Dnt ask me, I didnt perform it. But u cn rest assured tht th person who did is a gud guy wit respestable standing in society. N y did he do it u ask? Fr contributin 2 th eternal search fr th truth wht else? A search which nvr seems 2 end somehw no matter hw far v proceed but throws up new questions n puzzles @ evry turn. Which in turn require answers n so on. Its probably th most fundamental n @ th same time th most useless of mankind's quests. Knowin tht PI is irrational is of no practical value but nw tht v knw it hs become a must knw thing fr some stupid reason. Our ancestors werent ne worse off by just huntin n food gatherin nw wer they? Thn y this stupid shit tht is forced in2 evry human mind or atleast evry human mind tht undergoes a so called 'proper education'? Live like a wild man among th trees n Nature n it is considered improper behaviour conveniently forgettin tht v began like this. Yeah its in our nature 2 forget whr evrythin began. I cud hv coverd somethin like time travel but no I hd 2 go ovr this shit. Howevr this chapter is nw completely closed, somethin tht is a 1st fr this blog. A subject finished. N 2 b honest it does feel gud. Well atleast it does fr nw. Mayb tomorrow I'll wake up n hate myself fr leavin myself shorter by 1 topic but fr th moment its all gud........................

Cloudy

2006-07-24T19:07:00.000+05:30

Whrevr u go or r whtevr u think or do or evr think abt doin. Perfect numbers or friendly numbers, primes or co primes. Usin long words whr diminutive ones will do.............avoidin xclamation marks!!!!!!!!! Makin up stories as u go along. Lettinurwordsrunovreachothr. Order wit botherin nt. Useless senseless meaningless tautology. Hvin gud gremmer, Passin time usefully. Readin between th lines fr th meaning tht doesnt xist. Unecesarly chppin off alphbts fr unrequited brevity. Yes th list is nearly endless. I cud go on forevr dudes.Wht is th above krap? Doin things ur nt supposed 2 do? Naah thts th literal view th shallow view tht only idiots n fools c. REAL thinkers will go DEEP down 2 find meanings 2 stuff like this IF th person proclaims himself a thinker. So whts th hidden meaning? Aah tht cnt b revealed nw cn it? Ur nt a thinker n besides if revealed it'll no longer b hidden. Ur gonna break my head but I'll tell u hw 2 gain access 2 this classified information. 1st u gotta proclaim urself a thinker @ which juncture ppl will stone u n generally ostracise u. Well if ur still desperate enuff u thn gotta start propoundin rubbish tht is confusin or complicated enuff tht no1 understands it. N thn u also gotta gt a band of believers who will do nethin as long as u fill their pockets. Dnt worry, ull gt back all xpenses within six months or so if ur successful. If ur nt, well u cant wanna really knw. Tht info is ONLY fr thinkers..................

Scarlet

2006-07-23T11:29:00.000+05:30

Signin off nw n thn n nt keepin @ it as regularly as I used 2 b. A new paragraph of shit evryday hs nt been maintained in recent times n th gaps r gettin 2 numerous 2 fill. Slowin down or th wearin away of parts is pretty normal aint it? N hw is it tht th human brain fails only whn its called upon 2 do somethin in th same vein repeatedly instead of many varied jobs? Aftr all its is said practice makes a man (or woman dnt need no feminists jumpin on me) perfect rite? Cud th answer b gt mathematically? Does it evn hv an answer or is it just tht it cnt manage repititive tasks? But v blink our eyes evryday abt 100,000 times. N v dnt seem 2 gt tired of doin it nw do v? So y is it tht th supposedly most important of its jobs is limited in some way howevr minor? Hv faith. I knw these seem like just random hollerings of an incoherent mind but thrs more 2 it than tht. U c those who insist they c reason behind n in evrythin must by definition also c reason in unreasonable stuff as well. N thn thrs th fact tht thrs no use in thinkin if ur a damn vegetable tht cnt evn move or speak. Well atleast its far worse isnt it? Comin back 2 those who c reason in evrythin wht is th reason behind th unreasonable? Tht since thrs reason thr shud b no reason also? Thts such outdated thinkin tht simply doesnt belong in this century. Those who think it does sue me n b done wit it. I cnt wait ne longer. But thn patience ws nvr one among th few virtues I hv neways. Reason in rubbish needs 2 b investigated in furthr detail doesnt it? Th very definition is a paradox which again by definition is supposed 2 b self contradictory. N reason in no reason is very much self contradicting. Xploration of furthr paradoxes continues tomorrow.

Nymphetamine

2006-07-21T23:15:00.000+05:30

Random insanity time folks!!!!!!!!! Thts rite dudes its MMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAADDDDDD time as of nw!!!!!!! Do u really need a time 2 b insane? Just coz th world doesnt accept it doesnt mean u gotta b sane!!!!!! Yeah insanity is a perfectly acceptable state of mind. Aftr all it cud happen 2 ne1 @ all. Tis said v r all just one bad day away frm becomin wht is th mind doctor's worst fear namely a mindless blabberin fool hehehehehehe. Xplorin such randomness requires an xpertise nt usually found in ppl. Admit it u cnt just walk up 2 an zombie n ask it who it ws n hw it came 2 b this way nw cn u? Poor devil!!!!!!!!! Two times two must b four shudnt it? Hw wud u react if I were 2 say it is infact five or mayb evn three???????? Thts rite call me outta my mind or gone 2 th dogs or whtevr. Th fact remains tht Im writin this stuff n ur readin it. Whos th fool nw eh? Bet ur feelin pretty fed up or mayb evn pissed off or evn perhaps foolish nw. Logy stands fr study hence come th root of many different words which r names of study in different fields like thwology, geology, radiology, biology, zoology or mayb evn Egyptology etc. Point is does it evn matter? Surely it does coz aftr all evrythin is built on some strong foundation. Gt rid of th simple word 'logy' n u gotta gt rid of so many words u hv come 2 take fr granted. One, two buckle my shoe, three, four shut th door, five, six pick up sticks, seven, eight lay them straight, nine, ten a big fat hen!!!!!!!!!! N adios 2 u all buttheads!!!!!!!!!!!
*muhahahahahahahahahaha*

The power

2006-07-20T19:50:00.000+05:30

Does ne1 hv nethin? Some stupid shit tht ne1 cn comprehend? Or whtevr? Or mayb evn some abstract shit like th kind tht is present ovr here? Or is it tht all roads lead 2 abstraction? N cn a chain of questions b built up without a single answer? Hmm...... r v evn doin a pretty gud job of provin thts possible as of nw? Tryin 2 actually construct tht seemingly endless chain of queries? Is it evr gonna end? Or does th limitation only xist inside our heads? N tht it doesnt actually truly xist? Or does it xist but its presence hasnt been proved? Does tht road also lead in2 abstraction? N does abstraction or fuzziness or whtevr u wanna call it ultimately end up newhr or keep stretchin on like an endless labyrinth?????? Is it some stupid irony tht so many questions hv been asked without thr bein ne answers? Or does it personify mankind's eternal search fr an xplanation 2 nethin n evrythin? N y shud it happen here? Does it happen newhr else? N if it does whr? More fundamentally n importantly y does it happen? Y is thr no end 2 human curiosity? Y hs it been designed by th Almighty (or Satan dependin on whom u ask) 2 last forevr while th things it wonders abt end @ some time or th othr? Hw is it tht some ppl r more talented than othrs? Tht they cn apply their minds more effectively than othrs? Hw is it tht most ppl cn b masters @ only one thing? Y cnt thr b kings of all trades instead of kings of one or jacks of many? Who setup th facility 2 post anonymous comments on blogs? Y cnt some ppl come out n say wht they hv 2 say in th open instead of hidin as if th guy who maintians th blog will come out n knife them or somethin? N hw is it tht so many things r buzzin arnd in a tizzy but somehw becomin refined by th time they r posted here?

Changes

2006-07-17T22:28:00.000+05:30

Let it all go. Kinda thrown it all away time is it? Or is it just acceptance of failure? N if so failure @ wht?????? Nohin seems clear here. Well thts nt gonna b easily cleared up neways coz othrwise thr wud b no suspense or mystery. N tht wudnt b ne fun nw wud it? Yeah v r here fr fun n nt fr ne othr purpose. Do v make a U turn or just walk on? I leave it up2 u but here v r only gonna xplore one option fr nw. Cud cover th othr one later............... So walkin on v once again find ourselves headin in2 abstraction. V r approachin th precipice nw bet'n proper reason n a place whr nothin is fixed n constantly mutatin in2 somehin new. Yes a tomato cn become an apple here. Do u knw tht th tomato ws ealier called th love apple? N tht technically it is nt a vegetable but infact a fruit? Well who cares neways whtevr it may b?????? It cud b classified as a seed n it wud b still used in makin sauce, pizza toppings n food generally. No need 2 worry really. N ur gettin all worked up alredy!!!!! Y worry ovr such small things whn u cud die this nxt minute coz ur brain gt overheated frm tryin 2 comprehend wht ur currently readin. Sometimes it becomes 2 repititive doesnt it? Yeah well wht cn u do? All of life is a big circle it is said. Circles, circles, circles. Th most symmetrical of planar objects. Th largest area fr a given perimeter, uniform stress in water piping, no head or tail, no beginning or end etc. Th most prevalent shape in ou daily lives also as compared 2 ne othr. Or else its close relative, th 3D circle called in layman's terms th sphere. Do u knw thr is a compound called dihydrogen monoxide which n make u die by chokin? Wud u sign a petition 2 gt rid of it? Yeah u naturally wud. But do u also knw tht in day 2 day life its called water?????!!!!!!!!!

Futureal

2006-07-16T22:06:00.000+05:30

Somethin related 2 wht will b xplored today? Evr seen multiple choice questions? Well, it wud b hard fr me 2 actually give u options n ask u 2 proceed accordingly. Gotta think abt th alternatives Im gonna present n thn write appropriate paths u cn follow. Altho th idea flashed across my head, I cn implement it just yet. Needs some more plannin 2 carry out. Yeah u heard rite, sometime in th comin days I mite give u options which given my nature will probably b like choosin bet'n a rock n a hard place. Somethin like bet'n th Devil n th deep blue sea which originates frm th walkin th plank thingie carried out by pirates in earlier, less nicer days. If I wer 2 xplore notions abt th problem of choice, I wud gt 2 philosophical n cud probably put in down in a book but thts nt my aim hence I will nt proceed in tht direction. Mayb whn Im feelin really down n out................ Neways thts nt th point. Th point is Im ferociously tryin 2 keep this blog alive evn tho @ times I feel Im fightin a losin battle. Lose, its far easier than pushin n tryin 2 win n thn nt winnin sometimes. If ur lookin fr advice, ur @ th most wrong place u cn b buddy!!!!!!!!! Nothin 'proper' here, just twisted awful versions of worldly wisdom tht hs been passed donw thru generations of ppl. N y is it so? Y cudnt I just quote Shakespeare or Carlyle or whoevr? Y shud I? Cud b Im anothr thinker in th maikn hehehehehehehehe. Which is y only original (if somewht based on earlier teachings) thot is posted here. Todays post hs been surprisingly easy 2 make. Guess whn thrs a lot of fire underneath ur ass.....................

Out of control

2006-07-14T23:22:00.000+05:30

Wht is th meaning of life? Fuck th meaning of life. A much better topic is gettin fucked fr life. 2 those who feel thr is 2 generous a usage of xpletives so far, I seem in a mood fr cursin rite nw. Im confused as hell as well. Wrist painin frm RSI most probably, brain gummed up, muscles wasted away frm lack of use, sneezin frm a cold, in short life roxx rite abt nw!!!!!!!! N Da Psycho Blogger is laughin away fr some stupid reason. Tht stupid fucked up team of his wit Face n Cyanide always drives me up a wall somehw. No immaculate wordsmiths here, just plain simple language tht evry shitter cn understand. Gawd, thr is some deep dark change happenin inside me rite nw. Or is it REALLy happenin or is it just in my mind? Whoevr knws th answer deserves an award as evn I hvnt been able 2 figure it out yet. Whts it wit writin a draft neways? A less well turned out version of th final product is called a draft. Sometimes th supposed final result is sent back 2 th drawing board n becomes a draft itself. N wht is wit wit passin ur spare time neways? Evr heard of nt knowin wht 2 do in ur spare time? Funny tht u always wish u hd spare time!!!!!!! N whn u DO hv it u dnt knw hw 2 pass it. Grass is always greener on th othr side they say whoevr 'they' r. Publicity is nt 1 thing Im gud 2. N 2 b honest I dnt knw or care hw many idiots pass by or stop by this sad little corner of mine on th WWW. Its thr just fr me 2 gt all th shit outta my head so tht I cn think clearly. So wht cn u xpect xcept wht I wanna throw outta my mind hehehehehe..................

Obscured by clouds

2006-07-13T23:26:00.001+05:30

Whtevr happend? Nothin really, just a new outlook on life I guess. Happens 2 every1 Im told @ some time or th othr. Evr tried crossin Superman n Spider-man? Dnt coz ull end up wit an ugly mish-mash tht hs super strength, super speed n cn jump arnd like a monkey besides bein able 2 swim faster than th fastest fish of course!!!!!!!!! Stupid bullshit tht. Makes u wonder hw far ppl cn sink. Hw abt lower than rock bottom?????? Think its impossible? N yet ull come across atleast one such xample in ur life. I cn give tht 2 u in writing. Seriously. N y do I say tht? Coz Ive seen such bullshit wit my own eyes!!!!!!!!! N thn u mite say tht this blog is more of tht krap. Well, I just dnt care @ all!!!!!!!!! Yeah v cn continue like this forevr!!!!! Or cn v? Does this whtevr 'this' is hv an end like evrythin is supposed 2 hv? Or cn v xplore nothingness again n come up wit somethin entirely new? Somethin wit NO end? Here thn enter again Face n Blogger joined this time by nobody else. Th road 2 nowhr wasnt poperly xplored last time due 2 lack of patience n anger. No1 ws pissed off or impatient @ all. No siree, tht wnt do @ all!!!!!!!!! U need 2 b in th proper mental state 2 penetrate th mists of meaning surroundin th holy quest fr th eternal truth which by definition is th only truth coz it makes all othr truths false. Its coz @ their very root, all truths say thr is somethin but nowhr is nothin. It cnt xist by definition. Yet it does xist n hs infact evn hd its xistence proved beyond a shadow of doubt. Of course thr is no question of a layperson understandin th proof as it is 2 complicated. Neither cn it b understood by scientists as their poor little brains dnt work tht way. Havin commented on th proof, th actual journey will b covered later...................

Twilight

2006-07-12T11:44:00.000+05:30

Whtevr hs 2 happen will happen. A beginning tht hs many different meanings. This cud b u smashin all th eggs u wer carryin or evn fallin in2 a ditch by th road. Research in2 a krappy theory 2 xplain this hs been goin on fr sometime nw bein conducted by some1. Wht does a doctor hv 2 do wit this u ask? Therein lies th beauty of it. U c, while th theory thinks it is bein attacked frm a medical viewpoint, in reality v r wiser nw. Secretly Two Face is aftr it frm a scientific point of view. Yes, theories must b respected as livin creatures tht dnt want 2 b necessarily discovered. This simple xplanation also covers th fact tht certain theories r discovered long aftr th tools 2 discover them r available. Such xamples dnt wanna b uncovered, period. But they r nt livin, u mite say. Aah, I only stated tht thinkin of them this way xplains a lot abt them n hw they work or fucntion or whtevr. Feels gud thinkin abt it, doesnt it? V hv made an entirely new idea abt somethin tht is universally thot n accepted!!!!!!!! This is th very essence of KRap Research Inc. Questioning th very way our world functions n refinin n prunin whrevr v find current ideas unacceptable or as in this case, inadequate 2 fully give proper xplanations. Oddly enuff, th reason of y somethin tht must happen will happen hs nt yet been answered!!!!!!!!!!

The battle rages on

2006-07-10T23:01:00.004+05:30

Passion, power, sinful, aggression, rebellion, orgasmic, energetic, outta control!!!!!!!!!! A rather odd collection of words tht hv no meaning individually (OK I take tht back) or collectively. Hence this becomes a collection I like coz fr some strange reason I like it better whn things dnt hv a rhyme or reason 2 them. Nw is thr ne reason 2 tht? Hw cn u talk abt evn tht? Its alredy been stated tht thr shud b no reason. Heres anothr such set: direction, meaning, routine, symphony, curse, child, etc. Th list cn b MUCH longer but I prefer 2 leave it thr. Small, carefully constructed random lists r nicer than xtremely long lists tht inevitably lose their meaning. Truly random stuff cn nvr b 2 long or else it loses th essence of randomness. Well, u say, th world is random. But thn th world is nt our creation nw is it? Well, lets explore th history behind 'random'. A word 2 xplain disorder? Close relations include irregular, arbitrary, stochastic n unpredictable. Whtevr. Sittin here wasted n mournin @ this damn compu wit nothin in my mind 2 put down here REALLY suxx!!!!!!!! 'Random' ws made 2 define wht? Trees? Ppl? Stones? Or just irregularity? Nt sure thr wer tht many philosophers arnd those days. Th word philosopher ws itself coined by none othr than Pythagoras. Hw cud a man whose life's work ws in mathematics, th most orderly of scientific fields coin a word fr some1 whose work hs nt th slightest semblance of order? N thn he called himself a philosopher also. Neways comin back 2 random or irregular or whichevr word u wanna use, it defines somethin which is essentially undefinable, infact all things which r undefinable. A profound achievement tht. Well in todays world, random is also a state of mind as well. Very much th state of my mind as of nw. Thts pretty clear hehehehehehe!!!!!!!!! Th essence of this blog as well as cn b seen frm th title..............

Cry

2006-07-09T16:40:00.000+05:30

A fair number of ppl hv reared their heads on this page in th last few weeks. All they do is just appear n vanish without a trace. Infact th only person who seems 2 appear regularly is Da Psycho Blogger n Two Face 2 some xtent. Who r they neways? Just random hallucinations tht pop outta nowhr or real dummies?????? Nvr gt carried away it is said. Apparently Dan Brown wrote th Da Vinci Code as a novel so tht he cud say it ws just fiction n nt fact altho evrythin points in th othr direction. Is thr ne point 2 evn researchin th origins of ppl long gone evn if they wer very influential? N y does evry1 like th idea of a gud juicy scandal or controversy? Seems tht evn tho all of u say tht a peaceful life is th best n safest bet, v dnt hv qualms abt ne1 else havin skeletons in th closet. Continuin on this line of thot evry1 is a 2 sided or multi sided individual 2 some xtent. Which means tht evry1 wears a mask @ some time or th othr. Yeah, ur gonna accuse me of bein 2 proper rite nw. No matter, here v go in our self discussed random direction. Funny if u consider tht by definition a random direction cn nt b discussed. But thn wht is a definition? evr tried definin a definition. A definition is supposed 2 b a description. N whn u consider tht a description mayb vague or nt very well defined or whtevr, our definition of wht a definition is falls thru. It feels only half right. Hence, by definition (thrs tht damn word again) our definitions r nt foolproof. Or is it just tht definitions r correct & th definition of a definition is incorrect? Ill sleep ovr tht n try 2 define it properly!!!!!!!!!

Sanctuary

2006-07-08T17:54:00.000+05:30

Circumstances. Things happenin fr no particular reason. Apparently 2 preserve th order of th Universe. So as 2 nt upset th delicate balance tht supposedly xists in th world!!!!!!!!!! Nt evn sure wht th hell thts supposed 2 mean. No, Im just statin wht othr ppl hv alredy said. Apparently things nvr coincide whn u want em 2 n do so whn its nt @ all needed. So th essence of th underlyin order is 2 fuck up all order @ th higher levels, is tht it? Nice 2 think abt, an order tht screws all othr orders. Wish it wud mess up my work order once so tht I cud call in sick without ne problems. Naah, tht nvr seems 2 happen. Th entire structure is in such a way tht it is like rubber. Ne attempt 2 change it fails as it'll end up as it ws b4 in due time. Thn wht is th use of plannin ahead? Aftr all, tht is wht is advised all th time. Brings up many othr ways of thnkin thn doesnt it? Ways tht hv been xplored just 2 revise this fatal flaw. Mayb evn rip apart th world as v knw it just so tht th upper layer of order cn b preserved. But without fundamental order nothin else cn xist, cn it? Or is it evn possible? Xistence without ne foundation or base? Hvnt v been all lead 2 believe tht evrythin tht lasts long hs been given a strong footing? Ovr th course of time, Ive alredy proved several times tht thr r many faults in our way of thinkin so mayb this is again anothr human created limitation tht in reality does nt xist!!!!!!! Hw long do v continue like this? Hw much is 'real' n hw much in our heads? R v livin in some stupid matrix or some shit like tht? Y is soot raised up whn thr is an xplosion on th ground? Y cnt it just go furthr in2 th earth? No, it must go up n block out th sun's rays, thus deprivin th Fallen Angel of his only source of power. Wht thn will happen? With no order n no saviour n ppl like Da Psycho Blogger arnd well........................

Hush

2006-07-07T20:27:00.000+05:30

Knew it wud happen. Hd somethin in mind whn I ws thinkin of today's post but as usual Ive 4gtn it by th time I actually sat down 2 write it. Is this th classic case of burnout of th mind? Aftr all, no1 is perfect, nt evn in comin up wit rubbish all th time. Think abt losin th concept of time itself n if u cn do tht time no longer xists fr u which means tht u cn do supernatural things like bein in 2 dimensions @ once or evn doin many things togethr aka multi taskin!!!!!! No, I dnt mean talkin on th phone while typin in ur email. Hws abt talkin sense n rubbish @ th same time eh? Nw tht wud b somethin wudnt it? Or evn say meditatin in th 36th dimension n teleportin 2 some faraway star simultaneously. Whrevr did v end up here whn v wer discussin time u ask. Well, relativity states tht time is stitched in2 th fabric of space so if v r unbounded in time, by a complicated logical calculation tht includes evrythin frm special physics 2 tomatoes bein thrown toward th ceiling, v r also unbounded in space. Hence wht is stated above. Agreed, v hvnt evn discovered th 5th dimension yet, leave alone th 36th!!!!!!!!! But thn it hs been stated tht our world may hv been 11 dimensional all along so tht is nt really a major problem. Th nxt prominent idiot 2 come along wud say tht our world is in truth 100 dimensional, hence th complete absence of worry or fear newhr in my thinkin. Coz lets face it, whts th worst tht cn happen? It'll b shown tht our world is only 3 dimensional. Well, wud it matter in ne way? U wud still always gt up frm ur bed on th wrong side evryday (well, atleast on ur bad days!!!!), walk arnd a little n thn head off fr ur daily routine. No, u wudnt hv 2 brush in a new way or evn find an alternate way of filin ur nails. Thn y is it stated tht such theories r earth shatterin????????? Try 2 figure tht one out, it requires some dedicated thinkin which I hvnt been able 2 put in yet..................

Desire

2006-07-06T20:57:00.000+05:30

It is said tht everythin tht hs a beginnin hs an end. Of course, wht hs been conveniently left out is tht th damn end cn b newhr. Yeah, u heard me, newhr. N thn sometimes th end is nvr very clear. Somethin just ended, no idea whr it ended. N it doesnt seem 2 matter @ all neway sometimes. But y is it so? Does everythin tht hs a beginning hv an end? Wht abt time? It hs no end. Yet accordin 2 current theories time began @ th Big Bang. So will time also end sometime? Hehehehehe look @ us discussin th end of time, th end of evrythin, total destruction, th Apocalypse etc etc etc. Th end of an age n wht nt!!!!!! Sometimes winder hw is it tht evry1 agrees on hw its all gonna end but no1 agreeson hw it all began. Seems tht evry1 likes 2 c it all bein blown away but no1 likes 2 c evrythin bein created in one fashion. Apparently thr is only way of destroyin somethin but many ways of creatin it. Sometimes find it hard 2 agree wit tht idea. Aftr all a pot cn only b made by shapin clay n thn bakin it rite? Do u knw ne alternate way of doin th above action? I seriously doubt it. Well th human brain is fundamentally flawed neways. Evn whn th 2 halves r connected togethr, each half is nt always aware wht th othr is up2. So tht cud mean tht v arnt built rite @ all!!!!!!!!!! Only God knws wht he ws thinkin whn th so-called greatest creation of his is a job done improperly. N unfortunately ws smart enuff 2 figure it out fr himself. Hw does it feel 2 b somethin tht ws put togethr in a hurry eh? Doesnt feel gud nw does it? Yeah, keep tht in mind nxt time u cut corners in whtevr ur doin n b sure tht no1 is able 2 figure it out, nt evn urself hehehehehehe!!!!!!!!!!

Burn

2006-07-05T20:13:00.000+05:30

Ways 2 pass time hehehehe. Think abt tht fr a minute. Yeah, evn a moment will do. Just let it sink in. I cn understand, tht is in itself a very simple way of passin time. Hws abt walkin in th rain 2 hide ur tears? Nt very simple 2 do as rain is nt thr all arnd th year nw is it? Seems ur nt evn allowed 2 torment ppl in peace. Y so? Who knws? Came up coz Ive been havin trouble postin fr th past few days as me life is fucked. Ways 2 pass time r wide n varied n include lazin arnd, goofin off n of course tht oldest, most classic way which is obviously sleepin. Irreplaceable, tht one. Newer ways include bloggin, chattin n just browsin n chancin upon somethin useful. Wht th hell is happenin? Im actually puttin in some useful n relevant information here!!!!!!!!!!!! Guess every1 loses their way sometime or th othr. Nt tht it is ne reason fr me 2 back off, no way. I still hammer away @ my poor little brain tht tells me frm time 2 time 2 back off or else Ill go ravin mad. N evrytime I just ignore it n plow forward relentlessly as if it'll help ne1 in ne way. But thn it doesnt matter in th least bit as some things r meant 2 b useless in ne n evry way u look @ them. Aftr all, all of life is a great circle which goes arnd endlessly. Nt tht it evr seems tht way coz th uncertainity principle rules out th xact same events happenin again. But thr is a similarity if u look carefully enuff n close enuff. Aftr all, all of matter is composed of atoms. N if u believe in reincarnation mayb th same damn atoms come back again n again in different forms hehehehe. Nt sure abt tht so wnt pursue it furthr. U knw wht,I aint gonna proceed nw. This little thing will b completed @ a later date.

Fly

2006-07-04T01:43:00.000+05:30

Headin in2 abstraction or in th sad language v speak evryday, headin off nowhr in particular. It is said tht v only use somethin like 10% of our brains. Y is it so? Y r v unable 2 tap fully th power of our so called greatest organ? Apparently v r nt built in tht way unless v hv a mental workout daily startin as soon as v cn think properly. N by workout i mean somethin like solvin partial differential equations mentally. Whoa!!!!!!!! Take a deep breath thr n pause b4 u go furthr on this road 2 abstraction which is bein layed down nw by us as v walk along it fr th simple reason tht no1 else is such a big idiot or so foolish 2 evn attempt it n thn fall flat on their face. Dnt worry, v hv experienced scientist (n all round jerk) Two Face leadin us who claims he hs been here b4. It is actually his research which hs brought out Da Psycho Blogger out here frm th comfy surroundings of his room. Face's notes claim tht abstraction doesnt evn xist. But thn he hs made many claims b4 tht almost evrythin in this world doesnt xist so a lot of water hs flowed under th bridge since th time he ws a respected member of th scientific community. Hwevr here thr cn b no better guide as he is as demented as th rest of us who hv embarked on this dangerous n hazardous trip 2 th middle of nowhr. Th prime objective of this trip is 2 establish wht abstraction truly is n whn it cn b reached. While it hs been calculated hw far is Up, hw long it takes 2 gt Away n wht becomes of Gone, Abstraction hs eluded all attempts @ conquerin it. All proofs hv been flawed in some fundamental way n in general nothin hs come of it. Walk along as long as u feel like it. Wht tired alredy? No matter, Face n Blogger continue n eventually fade in2 th mist..........................

Last exit

2006-07-03T19:47:00.000+05:30

Theories, theories n theories. Seems thts all v cn come up wit whn v hv 2 much spare time wit nothin 2 do. Y is it so? N wht marks out th scientists n geniuses n othr dumbos who make life more miserable fr us by comin up wit shit like this which v gotta study? Do they think differently? No, I doubt ne of them think with their asses. OK, tht possibility is ruled out thn. So y th hell do they stick out like sore thumbs? Is it their obsession 2 tread their own path or wht? But if no1 does things differently, everythin wud b so borin nw wudnt it? Take fr xample this blog. Fr full details u gotta read th 1st post but th bottomline is tht this blog is just a collection of random thots, ideas, feelings n theories. Thr is nt evn a scrap of information or nethin relevant or evn nethin related 2 th person who hs th time 2 sit n write in it evryday. N still he continues. He goes on n on. Fr wht purpose? Only tht person himself, aka Da Psycho Blogger cud answer tht question. Does he think hes blazin a new trail? A world whr evrythin doesnt make sense n nothin makes sense? U dnt wnt th world passin in2 th hands of ppl like him nw do u? It'll b far worse than hell I tell u. I knw coz Ive xperienced it 1st hand. Organised chaos is wht he calls it actually. Feels tht things need 2 b in a mess fr him 2 find nethin in th 1st place. In short, th fuckin godfather of all paradoxes. Kinda makes sense tht he's able 2 come up wit so many paradoxes on a nearly daily basis. Tellin u nw, if u evr meet him, just run away n nvr look back unless u wanna b reduced 2 a scrap heap of human junk like him.

Once

2006-07-02T20:06:00.000+05:30

No, I dnt care n Im gonna try somethin REALLY offbeat today. Its nt rocket science but it manages 2 come very close. N by very close I mean VERY close indeed. It concerns th idea y v shud hv 2 capitalise letters whn v mean 2 say somethin out loud or shout it out whn v r online. As u cn c, Ive alredy capitalised 2 words till nw just 2 say tht Im emphasisin em. Still, th fundamental question remains y capitalisation? Y nt italics or somethin? N is thr ne need n does it evn make ne sense? Aftr all v r nt actually talkin, just chattin. Is shoutin a basic need of human beings tht v need a way fr its expression evrywhr? Nt kiddin @ all. evrytime a method of communication is setup, th 1st need 2 b looked in2 is makin urself heard. As opposed 2 this, thr is no way 2 put forward somethin quietly or without makin ne noise. U cn just say it normally, thts all. Y nt? Aftr all, v do whisper in day 2 day speech, dnt v? Or is it anothr of those things abt ppl which r nvr understood despite bein part of bein ppl? N if v cnt understand ourselves fully, wht business do v hv tryin 2 work out hw othr species think? It is said tht self realisation is th 1st step toward realisin th full self or some shit like tht. A bit 2 deep fr me, tht. Im 2 shallow 2 follow it fully. N no, I dnt claim 2 understand hw this system came in2 play. I just use it coz every1 else does. Anothr human characteristic tht, followin wht all do like a herd of sheep. Time 2 sign off nw b4 it becomes 2 philosophical n deep n all tht jazz. S'long, suckers!!!!!!

Even flow

2006-06-29T20:40:00.000+05:30

Hv been concentratin on specific subjects fr th past 2 days nw. Helps keep it krappy instead of becomin 2 deep n intense n stuff. After all, meaningless meanderings r much nicer 2 read n write than heavy shit which deep down hs a certain logic n meaning fr all its abstraction. Yeah, its nt easy 2 write shit tht is only dumb n nt deep. Everytime u try, ull come up wit ur own fucked up theory of y th earth is a sphere n nt flat, y th Pacific is th largest ocean in th world, y whn earth's supposedly most intelligent life form lives on land, only 25% of th earth is land n y all sounds r made frm some kinda vibrations. Its a unique way of passin time which is attractive 2 some n unattractive 2 many. Wonder y. Coz assumin th postulate tht everythin happens fr a reason, evn these useless theories hv a reason. Wht is th reason? Well, one cud b tht they make th idiots who study all th time look smarter. Didnt u knw?????? After all if u dnt hv duds 2 judge against, hw cn u say a certain person is a genius or workaholic or whtevr? If u find this hard 2 understand, v cn always think abt y time doesnt go backward n only moves forward. As always, this question is inextricably linked 2 another in my messed up mind. Which isnt? It leads 2 th straightforward question of y time travel is nt possible yet. It is said tht wit current theories a supercivilisation is required 2 build a time machine. Apparently, v wud need somethin (dnt ask me wht, I cnt recall) th size of th current observable Universe 2 make a time machine. U shud tread carefully thr. Th size of th Universe isnt tht large, is it? After all, whn I look @ th Moon, I cn cover it wit my thumb so th Universe @ max will b th size of an aeroplane or somethin. Now Im establishin myself as dumb, arent I? Nt tht it bothers me actually. Every1 who comes here is warned tht they r dealin wit a nutcase. Hold it rite thr. Im gettin 2 philosophical again. N since I cnt seem 2 gt out of this rut until I gt back 2 my rut, Ill just shut up n keep quiet. Peace, y'all!!!!!!!

Deep

2006-06-28T20:23:00.000+05:30

Lets keep things musical today shall v? N thr is no better place 2 begin than tht greatest of paradoxes n oxymorons called rap music. Hw is a contradiction u ask? Well th legal issues ovr it r still bein sorted out. Well leave tht aside n concentrate on th task @ hand. Who started rap music neways? I dnt knw n Im nt gonna break my head ovr it. Y shud I care? Lets us call this person whoevr he/she may b as X. X decides tht current music is nt gud enuff (or more probably tries 2 make it big n fails) n so sets abt creatin rap music. X decides tht thr will b minimum instrumentation. 2ndly 2 distance it evn further, X feels tht th words shud b spoken, nt sung. Nw whr did X get th idea 2 call this strange mishmash rap music? Leave alone callin it rap, hw does it evn define as music in th 1st place without ne1 singing n no music itself? Explorin this person's mindset will b interestin. Hw abt v do it rite nw? Ive been in thr loads of times. Th dummy obviously feels tht nethin cn b defined as nethin evn if it doesnt fit th definition properly or @ all. Apparently ur allowed 2 change everything one @ a time n say 'But thts only a single change' n evn whn everythin is new u cn still say 'Thts a new version'. Thr is a limit 2 rewritin th rules but thr seems 2 b no limit 2 hw much ur allowed 2 change within those rules. Whts th use of rules thn? Fr show? Thr y r they required? Fr th general public 2 nt point? So tht every1 cn say thr is a solid framework? It doesnt matter if tht framework is so flexible tht it is no longer solid. Christ, v r gettin very metaphorical here. Words r runnin ovr each othr n no longer make sense 2 ne1. Wht r words themselves? Does ne1 bother 2 ask this very simple 2 ask but very hard 2 answer question? Well, actually th answer is very simple. Words r sounds tht hv meaning. Nw wsnt tht simple? Yeah I knw ur holdin ur head in ur hands........................

Release

2006-06-27T23:19:00.000+05:30

OK, I admit shamefacedly tht today's topic is fully physical n beyond th understanding of most laypersons. So if ur a failure in math n physics, leave nw or else dnt complain tht I burned up ur brain (or whts left of it) n left u evn dumber than b4. I take no responsibility fr ne future Einsteins or Newtons becomin dodderin idiots aftr readin this. With tht disclaimer, lets launch in2 th discussion of y th sky is blue. Told u its gonna b physical in nature. Still readin? U gt guts, u nigger. Well, lets analyse th whole thing. Th famed scientist Two Face th Paradox believes tht blue is a special case in th universal waves tht gt attracted by th human eye more easily. Howevr it hs nvr bn proved satisfactorily tht universal waves xist. V knw of eletromagnetic waves n gravity waves. Th supporters of this theory say tht everythin hs a beginnin n so all th waves must hv bn together @ some point way back in time. Hence th universal wave. Th opposing force points out tht it is nt necessary tht all waves wer created together so they cudve developed separately. But I digress. My own opinion is tht 2 solve this knotty problem, v need 2 answer th question y life xists on earth. Y nt Mars or Jupiter or somethin? OK, those worlds cannot support earthly life but hw abt alien life forms? I agree tht v r goin in2 th region of speculation but thr is no other way forward. A life form cn xist in carbon dioxide n no water @ all. Wht do v knw? Just coz v hvnt discovered ne life of this kind or r unable 2 create it does it mean tht it doesnt xist? This leads us 2 question human intelligence itself. V r able 2 question everythin out thr but wht abt questionin our ability 2 question? Y doesnt ne1 do tht? Coz v cnt reason properly? This throws a shadow on our power 2 reason evn. Do v reason properly or do v just think v reason properly? N if this is so, y do v think v reason properly n nt improperly? Whts th problem in labellin wrong as right n vice versa? If th entire world wer reversed, v cud still live out our lives. Just tht everythin wud b reverse. Y does tht bother us so? Is it some deep rooted fear in our sorry little minds tht makes it so? N is it tht same fear tht keeps us sane or on th right track? Tht prevents a person wit gud upbringin frm becomin a useless bum? Hmm, v still hv 2 answer th question of y th sky is blue.......................

Twilight

2006-06-26T12:47:00.000+05:30

U knw wht, Im completely, totally, utterly blank nw. Unable 2 think or evn try 2 gt in2 th groove. Wht th fuck shud I do? Shud I just curl up n die? Or do I strike out @ ne1 n evry1 tht dares cross my path? So many questions n yet thr r hardly ne answers. Th same tired shit again n again. Th day of doom is near n it is th time fr everythin 2 end. Gawd, hw stupid cn u gt??????? Thr ws an Ice Age a long time ago. I of course mean relatively coz if u consider th age of th earth, its nt very long but if u consider hw long human beings hv been arnd, it Is very long indeed!!!!!!!! Extraterrestrial life wud seem 2 xist as of nw altho thr hs been no contact yet. Damn, a satellite made 2 detect alien life cudnt detect life on earth properly. Whr does tht leave us? Simple, wrapped up in our own sad thots n starin @ screens n listenin fr a message tht mite nvr come. Does it compare 2 nethin currently bein done? Cn it evn b compared? Does all of life hv a yardstick against which it cn b benchmarked? Y do v lie? Coz every1 does sometime in their lives. Its tht straightforward an answer.